The Freedom of Information Act and Accountability in University Research

By Pritchard, David; Sanders, Craig | Journalism Quarterly, Summer 1989 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Freedom of Information Act and Accountability in University Research

Pritchard, David, Sanders, Craig, Journalism Quarterly

In general, information on government research grants is covered by FOIA only if it is in possession of a government agency.

Increasingly, citizens and policy-makers look to science to help solve pressing national and international problems relating to such matters as health, environmental quality, and defense. It's no surprise, then, that the federal government is the primary funder of university research in the United States.1 With federal money comes an interest in the policy implications of research, and scientists are regularly asked to contribute to the development of governmental policy.

In recent years, however, several widely publicized cases of fraud have raised questions about accountability in research, especially federally funded research.2 For scientists, promotions and better jobs depend to a great extent on publications in scholarly journals. The pressure to produce high numbers of publications can tempt researchers to fabricate findings.3 Peer review of grant proposals and of manuscripts submitted to scholarly journals is of little help because peer review is designed to assess the quality of a piece of research, not to uncover fraud.4

Fraud is most likely when scrutiny of the research process is least.5 Many scienlists zealously guard their data and lab notebooks6; for the most part, scientists are accountable only to other scientists. However, as Justice Brandeis once said, sunshine is the best of disinfectants. If members of the public (including journalists and scientists) had a greater right of access to information about federally funded research, fraud would be less likely. Increased openness leads to increased accountability.

In addition to inhibiting fraud, a freer flow of information about science and technology might have other benefits. For example, many believe that increased scrutiny by the press and public could help avert incidents such as the accident at the Three-Mile Island nuclear power plant7 and the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger.8

This article examines the extent to which the Freedom of Information Act,9 designed to increase accountability among public institutions, enables access to information about federally funded university research. The topic has clear relevance to journalists who cover science or higher education. But it also relates to the much broader debate about access to government information generally,10 as well as about control of science information.11 Scientists often are unwilling to communicate to the public via the news media.12 And when scientists do talk to reporters, they often attempt to exert tight control over the nature of the communication.13

Although journalists who cover science rarely take an adversarial stance toward their sources,14 journalists and scientists sometimes differ over access to information.15 In such cases, a reporter may turn to the FOIA to try to obtain information that a scientist has been unwilling to provide.


United States citizens have no constitutional right of access to information about government-funded research. Although information-gathering has been linked to the ability to exercise First Amendment rights,16 the Supreme Court "has never intimated a First Amendment guarantee of a right of access to all sources of information within governmental control."17 In the absence of a clear First Amendment right, the court has said that determining what kinds of information must be available to the public is "clearly a legislative task."18 Accordingly, public access to governmental information hinges on what former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once called "the tug and pull of the political forces in American Society."19

In 1966 those political forces produced the FOIA, which created a strong legal presumption that information about federal activity should be available to the public. A series of amendments in 1974 strengthened the act, which has been the principal legal instrument used by citizens seeking access to information about federally funded university research.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Freedom of Information Act and Accountability in University Research


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?