Student Attitudes towards Group Work among Undergraduates in Business Administration, Education and Mathematics

By Gottschall, Holli; García-Bayonas, Mariche | Educational Research Quarterly, September 2008 | Go to article overview

Student Attitudes towards Group Work among Undergraduates in Business Administration, Education and Mathematics


Gottschall, Holli, García-Bayonas, Mariche, Educational Research Quarterly


Group work is a widely used teaching technique in higher education. Faculty find themselves utilising this method in their classes more and more, yet few studies examine what students actually think about group work. The current study surveyed Mathematics, Education, and Business Administration majors at a midsized southeastern university in order to measure students' attitude towards group work. Participants completed a 5-point Likert type attitude scale and selected positive and negative aspects of group work. The scale scores were submitted to a One-Way ANOVA and results indicated a difference in attitude across majors. Analysis of the positive and negative aspects of group work revealed generally similar results across majors, but with some exceptions. Education majors had a more positive attitude toward group work than Business and Mathematics majors and Business majors selected more negative aspects than the Education and Mathematics majors. As may be anticipated, across majors "free riding" was sited as an obstacle to group work as was the difficulty in coordinating schedules. Additionally, over one-third of students indicated that they would rather work alone.

Student Attitudes Towards Group Work in Higher Education Group work is an increasingly viable alternative to the lecture-based method for classroom learning in higher education (Fink, 2002; Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1991b; Parsons & Drew, 1996; Phipps et ai, 2001). Since 2001, the National Survey of Student Engagement's (NSSE) annual report has included group work, cooperative learning or collaborative learning (all used interchangeably for the purposes of this article) as one the five benchmarks for assessing effective educational practice along with level of academic challenge, student interaction with faculty, enriching educational experiences, and supportive campus environment (National Survey of Student Engagement 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005). The 2005 NSSE results indicated that nationally, 88% of first year students and 89% of seniors reported that they worked with other students on projects inside of class at least "sometimes." Additionally, 85% of first year students and 93% of seniors reported working on projects with others outside of class. These reports suggest that the amount of active and collaborative learning is an indicator of the pedagogical effectiveness of the institution as a whole. Group work is also considered by many instructors as a methodologically sound way of utilizing class time and a robust technique for students to interact and learn from each other. Nevertheless, the reasons why faculty in higher education use groups are not necessarily linked with the results obtained from empirical research but rather, anecdotal evidence. They have heard other instructors' experience with it, or they may have the intent of introducing variation in the classroom. But what does the research really tell us about group work in practice, aside from previous studies on achievement gains (e.g., Johnson & Johnson, 1989; Slavin, 1995)? Furthermore, what do the students themselves think about group work?

Review of Literature

Several studies have addressed the issue of students' reaction to the use of group work and the results vary. Overall, the past findings support the claim that students think positively of group work as a method of instruction (e.g., Hagen, 1996; Phipps et aL, 2001; Rau & Heyl, 1990; Van Duyne, 1993). Rau and Heyl (1990) documented that collaborative discussion groups during class time were well received by approximately 75% of their students, whereas the remainder would rather work alone. In addition, they found that students performed better on group test questions than on individual test questions and formed more social networks, compared to a class where group discussions were not implemented. However, on the negative side, there was free riding, as evidenced by students' end of course evaluations.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Student Attitudes towards Group Work among Undergraduates in Business Administration, Education and Mathematics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.