Rise and Fall of PRI and Its Inspirations/PROSPÉRITÉ ET DECADENCE DE PRI ET SON INSPIRATIONS

By Rong, Tan | Canadian Social Science, May 1, 2008 | Go to article overview

Rise and Fall of PRI and Its Inspirations/PROSPÉRITÉ ET DECADENCE DE PRI ET SON INSPIRATIONS


Rong, Tan, Canadian Social Science


Abstract:

PRI, which was in power for 71 years, had been the most powerful party in Mexico. However, it was defeated by AC, the union of PAN and PVEM, in 2000 election. The firm position of a party in power is based on its social foundation that relies on its abilities to mobilize and control over society. The rising and declining experiences of PRI show that the party in power must have the abilities of forming and strengthening ideological condensation, transforming system, adjusting policy as well as coordinating and condensing the varied interests of society, then can it make itself remain invincible.

Key words: PRI, ideological condensation, transforming system, policy ability,coordinating interests

Résumé: PRI, qui a été au pouvoir pendant 71 ans, a été le plus puissant parti au Mexique. Toutefois, il a été défait par AC, l'union de PAN et PVEM, dans l'élection en 2000. Que la position solide d'un parti au pouvoir est basée sur sa fondation sociale repose sur ses capacités à mobiliser et à contrôler la société. Les expériences de prospérité et decadence de PRI montrent que le parti au pouvoir doit avoir la capacité de former et renforcer la condensation idéologique, de transformer le système, d'adapter la politique ainsi que de coordiner et condenser de divers intérêts de la société, ainsi peut-il se faire rester invincible.

Mots-Clés: PRI, condensation idéologique, transformer le système, capacité politique, coordiner les intérêts

Continuously holding power for 71 years from March 1929 to December 2000, PRI Once was the most powerful party in Mexico. In 1980s, it even had a party membership of 13 million2 and therefore became the most populated party and the one remained in power for the longest period of time in Latin America.

Such was a miracle in a political arena with numerous opposition parties, heating competitions and frequently reshuffles of power like Latin America that a party had been able to steadily stay in power for such a long time. However, in the July 2000 election of Mexico, PRI candidate Labastida lost toFox, candidate of AC, the Union of PAN and PVEM, which finished the 70 years' regime of PRI and brought the country into the first period that an opposition party governs in modern Mexican history.

The result of the election astonished the whole world. Why did a party as powerful as PRI degenerate from rising to fall, from a party supported so heartedly and extensively by its people to one complained all over the country and was eventually extricated from its position? This essay attempts to explore this question from the perspectives of ideological condensation, transforming system, policy ability and aggregation of interests, and seeks to find valuable enlightenment.

1. THE FACTOR OF IDEOLOGICAL CONDENSATION

PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party) was the outcome of the Mexican Revolution from 1910 to 1917. It was formed in 1929 as Revolutionary National Party (Spanish: "Partido Nacional Revolucionario" or PNR). The party, reorganized for several times, changed its name to its current name Partido Revolucionario Institucional in 1946. At the time PNR was founded, Mexico was under a period when political turbulence and disruption was exacerbated by countless caudillos. The situation was deteriorated further by sharp social conflicts, slow economic development, fewer export increase rate, decreasing employment rate, falling proportion of industrial labor, declining payment to workers and increasing proportion of agricultural labor. Facing these contradictions together with political and social problems, PNR drew a conclusion out of years experience: Western theories could not meet the actual need of Mexico, and thereby could not help to solve those problems in reality. Mexicans could only depend on themselves to search for a path suitable to their own development. PRI was established under such guidelines.

Since its founding, PRI was a party "paid special attention to ideological struggle"3. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Rise and Fall of PRI and Its Inspirations/PROSPÉRITÉ ET DECADENCE DE PRI ET SON INSPIRATIONS
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.