Detection of High Ability Children by Teachers and Parents: Psychometric Quality of New Rating Checklists for the Assessment of Intellectual, Creative and Social Ability

By Sommer, Ulrike; Fink, Andreas et al. | Psychology Science, April 1, 2008 | Go to article overview

Detection of High Ability Children by Teachers and Parents: Psychometric Quality of New Rating Checklists for the Assessment of Intellectual, Creative and Social Ability


Sommer, Ulrike, Fink, Andreas, Neubauer, Aljoscha C., Psychology Science


Abstract

In the present study we devised scales for teachers' and parents' estimation of intellectual, creative and social abilities of fourth grade elementary school pupils. Their scores were related to psychometrically determined ability scores. Ninety-three school pupils in the age range between 9.3 and 11.2 years, as well as their parents and teachers took part. The new rating checklists proved as sufficiently reliable (particularly the teachers' version). Analyses of validity showed a high correspondence in parents' and teachers' estimations of cognitive intelligence, but much lower correspondence for creativity and social ability. Correlating teachers' and parents' estimates with the respective psychometric tests shows that teachers and parents were better at identifying intellectual (high)ability than detecting creative and social abilities. With the exception of social (high)ability, where girls were usually regarded as highly socially gifted by their parents, there were no differences in parents' and teachers' estimations of boys and girls.

Key words: high ability, intelligence, creativity, social competence, parents' and teachers' estimation

In the field of ability assessment, information is gathered by means of psychometric approaches (such as intelligence and creativity tests) as well as by parents' and teachers' assessments of pupils' cognitive or creative abilities. In the applied educational or pedagogical domain, a pre-selection of children through a single person's estimation often precedes the final identification of (high)ability through psychometric assessment, accompanied with the assignment to special talent fostering programs. In this particular context, it has to be considered that even if an individual is able to assess another person's cognitive ability accurately, this can only support the diagnostic process and can never constitute the sole basis for a decision. Thus, the question concerning the quality of subjective assessment judgements still remains a matter of debate (Wild, 1991).

Particularly teachers' decisions are often used in the context of ability assessment, along with psychometric tests for obtaining "first-hand" information about the respective cognitive or creative (high-)ability. For Wieczerkowski and Wagner (1985), the most prominent advantage of teachers' decisions is that this information can be gathered quite economically. Furthermore, Wild (1991) names more advantages of teachers' decisions: Due to their professional experience, teachers have the benefit of being able to compare pupils of the same grade or age (cf. Wild, 1991). Because of this fact, teachers should be sufficiently able to estimate pupils' abilities in comparison to other pupils. Moreover, teachers' decisions are not only influenced by the pupils' actual learning outcome, but also by the individual's successive learning process (Wild, 1991). Furthermore, due to a longer observation period, teachers are able to recognize even temporary or short-term fluctuations in pupils' achievements and efforts.

However, there are also fundamental problems associated with teachers' decisions. One is that teachers cannot ,,detach themselves" in their assessments from the pupils' achievements at school (Holling & Kanning, 1999).

Along with teachers' estimations, parents' decisions are also often used for the identification of (high)ability. According to Rost (1991), parents' estimations should primarily be considered in pre-school children as almost no adequate psychometric tests for the assessment of ability in this age range exist and frequently no other sources of information are available.

The advantage of parents' estimations over teacher ratings is the fact that the former can observe their children's behavior and accomplishments in various situations and, thus, are better able to judge their children's abilities. A disadvantage of parents' judgements is that they have fewer possibilities of comparison to other children (Schiefer, 2004). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Detection of High Ability Children by Teachers and Parents: Psychometric Quality of New Rating Checklists for the Assessment of Intellectual, Creative and Social Ability
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.