EXPORT LED GROWTH vs. GROWTH LED EXPORTS: LDCs EXPERIENCE

By Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen | The Journal of Developing Areas, Spring 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

EXPORT LED GROWTH vs. GROWTH LED EXPORTS: LDCs EXPERIENCE


Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, The Journal of Developing Areas


ABSTRACT

Previous studies that investigated the export led growth hypothesis, relied upon Granger or Sims causality detection approach. Since these approaches employ first differenced variables, any inference could be short-run in nature. In this paper we consider the relation between exports and economic growth to be a long-run phenomenon. After applying Johansen's cointegration technique to establish the long-run relationship between exports and output (in presence of other factors), we rely upon weak exogeneity tests proposed by Johansen to establish exogeneity of exports or output. Annual data over 1960-99 period from 61 countries are used for analysis. The results are country specific and there is no uniform pattern.

JEL Classifications: F10

Keywords: Export Growth, Income Growth, Cointegration

INTRODUCTION

One of the areas in international and development economics that has received a great deal of attention by researchers is the relation between export growth and economic growth. Based on economic theory, one could easily postulate that an increase in exports leads to an increase in real GDP through the well-known multiplier effect. On the other hand, increase in real GDP could lead to realization of economies of scale and cost reduction that could, in turn, boost exports.

Due to lack of long time-series data, early studies employed either crosssectional data or panel data to establish the relation between export growth and economic growth. The list includes Kravis (1970), Michalopoulos and Jay (1973), Voivodas (1973), Michaely (1977), Balassa (1978a, 1978b, 1982, 1985), Heller and Porter (1978), Tyler (1981), Feder (1983), and Kavoussi (1984). In general, these studies provide support for the positive relation between export growth and economic growth. However, these studies have well-known weaknesses, including uncertainty about exogeneity of export variable. Furthermore, they do not incorporate country specific factors into analysis due to the nature of the data (cross-sectional).

To overcome the deficiencies associated with cross-sectional studies, for any country that enough time-series observations are available, researchers employed timeseries data and using ordinary least squares estimation method tried to establish the relation between export growth and economic growth. The list includes Krueger (1978), Ram (1987), Salvatore and Hatcher (1991) and Sengupta (1993). These studies did not investigate whether causality is from export growth to economic growth or vice versa. Given the evidence of unit root in most macro variables, they used non-stationary data. Thus, their estimates could be spurious.

Since introduction of Granger's (1969) and Sims' (1972) concept of causality within time-series framework, researchers shifted their emphasis toward investigating causality between export growth and output growth. The list includes Jung and Marshall (1985), Chow (1987), Ahmad and Kwan (1991), Bahmani-Oskooee et al. (1991), Ahmad and Harnhirun (1992), Hutchison and Singh (1992) and Dodaro (1993). In general, these studies have failed to provide strong support for export led growth (ELG) or growth led exports (GLE) hypothesis. One reason, as pointed out by Bahmani-Oskooee and Alse (1993) is that they have ignored to incorporate the cointegrating properties of exports and output in their testing procedure. Engle and Granger (1987) show that when two variables are cointegrated, there is an additional channel through which one variable can Granger cause the other variable and that is through what they call an error-correction term. Indeed, when Bahmani-Oskooee and Alse (1993) employ granger causality test inclusive of an error-correction term, they do provide strong support for bi-directional causality between exports and real GDP in almost all countries that they consider. Subsequent authors such as Kugler and Dridi (1993), van den Berg and Schmidt (1994), and Ahmad and Harnhirun (1995) who employed cointegration and error-correction modeling, also provided some support for bi-directional causality.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

EXPORT LED GROWTH vs. GROWTH LED EXPORTS: LDCs EXPERIENCE
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?