Irrational Exuberance

By Ahmed, Parvez | Islamic Horizons, January/February 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Irrational Exuberance


Ahmed, Parvez, Islamic Horizons


How greed contributed to the making of an economic nightmare and our pathway to reform. BY PARVEZ AHMED

In December 1996, then-chairman of the Federal Reserve Board ("the Fed") Alan Greenspan said: "But how do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values, which then become subject to unexpected and prolonged contractions ...?" Immediately after this pronouncement, Tokyo's stock market fell sharply and closed down 3%, Hong Kong's fell 3%, Frankfurt's and London's fell 4%, and America's fell 2 percent. This strong reaction made the term "irrational exuberance" famous and focused global attention on fear and greed as the two most powerful factors shaping market behavior. A decade later in May 2007, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the most popular indicator of the stock market's health, after nearly doubling; dropped 49% in value, eighteen months later.

When financial markets gyrate Main Street feels the pain. Jobs are being lost at a record rate; unemployment, which stood at 4.5% in May 2007, reached 6.5% in Octo- ber 2008, a whopping 43% increase in about eighteen months. At the core of this malaise stands the housing market collapse brought on by the astronomical foreclosure rates. In August 2008, RealtyTrac (www.RealtyTrac.com) reported 303,879 foreclosure filings: default notices, auction sale notices, and bank repossessions. This 27% increase from just a year ago revealed that one in every 416 American households had received a foreclosure filing during the month. These foreclosures led to a credit squeeze in the banking sector, which, in turn, led to the $700 billon bailout package passed by Congress that the then President Bush signed into law in September 2008.

Are Investors Really Rational? How did we get to this point? Why were ordinary taxpayers forced to underwrite the gam- bling practices of the rich and powerful (the $700 billion bailout)? It is indeed bad eco- nomics when the federal gov- ernment socializes risk while keeping profits privatized. But it would have been equally foolish to allow the federal government to stand on the sidelines while a terrible credit squeeze paralyzed the general economy. The bailout (euphemistically called the "rescue" package) will not solve the current economic problems that have surfaced due in part to decades of dogmatic belief that the "invisible hand" can keep markets efficient and in Pareto optimum.

Pareto optimality, named after Italian sociologist and economist Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923), occurs when economic resources and output are allocated in such a way that no one can be made better offwithout sacrificing the well-being of at least one person. For over a decade, the regulators of the economy (the Fed and the Treasury) placed an inordinate emphasis on laissezfaire (hands-off or let do) ideology, thus favoring systems that tilted the playing field toward efficiency without regard for the equally important societal concern of fairness. Moreover, they assumed investors to be "rational," thus disregarding an emerging body of literature in finance and economics that posited investor behavior to be less than rational. This literature argued that investor behavior is influenced by such psychological biases as cognitive dissonance, which is the result of people pursuing heuristic simplifications (shortcuts to decision making) and selfdeception (people believing that they are better decision makers than they actually are).

Learning from History. Neglecting the past is a sure recipe for being condemned to repeat it. The 2008 crisis has many an- tecedents, perhaps none more important than the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, which allowed Wall Street and the banking system to become essential enablers of this crisis. Glass-Steagall was enacted in the wake of the 1929 crash, which many economists believe was partly responsible for the Great Depression that followed. While this legislation was a response to the country's greatest economic catastrophe (among other tell-tale signs, one in five banks had failed), its repeal came without much fanfare.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Irrational Exuberance
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?