Beef Producer Preferences and Purchase Decisions for Livestock Price Insurance

By Fields, Deacue; Gillespie, Jeffrey | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, December 2008 | Go to article overview

Beef Producer Preferences and Purchase Decisions for Livestock Price Insurance


Fields, Deacue, Gillespie, Jeffrey, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics


Personal interviews were conducted with beef cattle producers in Louisiana to determine their preferences and purchase decisions for livestock price insurance. Conjoint analysis was utilized to determine the importance of selected attributes of insurance policies for these producers. The characteristics of producers who prefer given attributes were also identified. Producers rated products given four economic situations to evaluate. A two-limit tobit model was used to estimate the part worth utility values for each attribute. Univariate probit models were estimated to evaluate the influence of producer characteristics on purchase decisions.

Key Words: conjoint, livestock price insurance, ordered probit, two-limit tobit

JEL Classifications: C25, D81, Q12, Q13, Q16

Beef producers are exposed to substantial price risk resulting from changes in factors including but not limited to beef imports, food safety issues, domestic meat supplies, and domestic demand. Cash-forward pricing and futures and options contracts are the primary tools avail- able for managing price risk associated with livestock production. These tools are not, however, widely used by beef cattle producers. A 1998 study by USDA-APHIS found that forward pricing strategies were used by only about 1.5% of U.S. beef cattle producers. Cash-forward pricing, such as video auctions, is used by a limited number of producers, but requires uniformity among calves, extensive records, and substantial coordination to be conducted successfully. Use of futures and options requires extensive knowledge of com- modity markets, and many producers are not comfortable with this strategy.

The U.S. Congress appropriated funds to develop Livestock Price Insurance (LPI) as part of the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000, with the goal of reducing livestock producers' exposure to price risk. In December 2002, a pilot program for feeder cattle was approved for states primarily in the Midwest. In 2005, approximately 3,300 livestock policies were sold, covering nearly 780,000 head of cattle. By July 2007, the program had been expanded by 17 states located in the Pacific, Southwestern, and Southeastern United States to include a total of 37 states (including the state in which the present study was conducted, Louisiana) (USDA-Risk Management Agency). Existing LPI products represent combinations of distinct attributes. The premium price, coverage level, and policy length are attributes that are commonly offered at different levels for most insurance policies. Attributes used to make up LPI products will ultimately determine the level of producer participation and the overall success of the program.

The primary goals of this study are to: (1) determine the importance of LPI product attributes among cow-calf producers and (2) determine the types of producers who will purchase and the economic situations under which they are most likely to purchase LPI. Determining the relative importance of LPI attributes and identifying the characteristics of producers who prefer certain attributes provides insight to policy makers and private insurers for the development of new LPI products.

The hypothetical LPI product evaluated in this study sets a price guarantee based upon the beef cattle futures price. Producers can guarantee a price at or below the futures price at a given point in time. To purchase LPI, producers pay a premium that is calculated based upon the deductible or coverage level the producer prefers (the higher the deductible, the lower the premium). The deductible is subtracted from the quoted futures price to establish the guaranteed price for the producer. For example, if a futures price of $90/cwt were quoted and a producer selected a $5/cwt deductible, he or she would have an $85/cwt price guarantee. The producer would pay the premium associated with a $5/cwt deductible. The associated indemnity payment would be based on the USDA Market News average price for that class of livestock at the end of the policy term.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Beef Producer Preferences and Purchase Decisions for Livestock Price Insurance
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.