Mandatory Arbitration for Customers but Not for Peers: A Study of Arbitration Clauses in Consumer and Non-Consumer Contracts
Eisenberg, Theodore, Miller, Geoffrey P., Sherwin, Emily, Judicature
Mandatory arbitration clauses have been in the spotlight recently, as consumer advocates have challenged dieir legitimacy. Popular consumer products such as cellular phone service, credit cards, and discount brokerage often come with fine print contracts in which the customer agrees to submit disputes to arbitration rather than to litigate in court. Typically, the customer also agrees not to participate in aggregate proceedings such as class actions, either in court or before an arbitrator. Another common contract provision makes arbitration clauses and class arbitration waivers non-severable, so that if an arbitrator authorizes claimants to aggregate dieir claims, they must instead ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Mandatory Arbitration for Customers but Not for Peers: A Study of Arbitration Clauses in Consumer and Non-Consumer Contracts.
Contributors: Eisenberg, Theodore - Author, Miller, Geoffrey P. - Author, Sherwin, Emily - Author.
Journal title: Judicature.
Volume: 92.
Issue: 3
Publication date: November/December 2008.
Page number: 118+.
© American Judicature Society Nov/Dec 2008.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset