Travel, Meal, & Entertainment Expense Deductions in U.S. Tax Court Cases

By Petersen, Henry T.; McKee, Tim C. | Southern Business Review, Summer 2008 | Go to article overview

Travel, Meal, & Entertainment Expense Deductions in U.S. Tax Court Cases


Petersen, Henry T., McKee, Tim C., Southern Business Review


Travel and entertainment expenses for business have always been deductible. These expenses are considered an integral part of businesses maintaining client relationships and developing new potential clients. After all, business is about maintaining current clients and obtaining new ones. Therefore, the tax deductions for these expenses have been and now are permitted as legal business expense tax deductions.

The Tax. Reform Act of 1986

It became apparent under the Jimmy Carter administration that some of these legal tax deductions were being abused. Consequently, Congress decided to change the tax law. At first Congress wanted to forbid any business from taking a deduction for any alcoholic drinks. But on second thought1 Congress decided not to do this. In addition, Congress still thought that excessive deductions for alcoholic drinks should not be permitted nor should excessive entertainment expenses be permitted. For example; front row tickets to the Super Bowl or the World Series when paying scalper prices would not be an appropriate expense. So, Congress decided to exclude 50 percent of all entertainment and business meals expenses. Congress called this the "three martini" business lunch rule, a name that has stuck and can be found in basic tax textbooks and in various business articles.

Therefore, instead of limiting the definition of a tax deduction Congress decided to limit all meal and entertainment expenses to 50 percent of expenditures. Under the Tax Reform Act of 1 986, a business can still allow clients or potential clients to have "three martinis" at lunch but the tax deduction would be limited to 50 percent. The actual law can be found in The Internal Revenue Code Section 274.

As to tax deductible entertainment expenses, the tax code does not differentiate between what entertainment is acceptable and what is not. If one takes a client or potential client to the symphony it should be deductible as an entertainment expense. If one goes to a baseball game, that too would be deductible. But what if one takes a client to a wrestling match? The answer is that the tax code does not judge the quality of entertainment. As long as it is a legal activity, it can be a tax deduction.

This article will discuss selected U.S. Tax Court cases involving travel, meal and entertainment expenses. Cases will be cited from court decisions and the actual IRS code. The cases cited may seem to be, and in many cases are, contradictive. Most cases selected for analysis have occurred since the "Tax Reform Act of 1986" but some older cases were selected to demonstrate the historically contentious nature of business expense deductions claimed by corporate and individual taxpayers.

It can be tempting for a corporation or business owner to claim unsubstantiated travel, meal and entertainment expenses as business expense deductions. The non-deductible portion of travel expenses, and meal and entertainment expenses subject to the 50 percent reduction rule represent a dollar for dollar reduction in the gross income, thereby reducing taxable income.

Throughout the research of applicable cases it, became apparent that when travel, meal and entertainment expenses were disallowed by the courts, it almost always involved a lack of proper substantiation on the part of the taxpayer, whether corporate or individual, under IRS Code, Section 274(d). This paper will present multiple cases demonstrating this fact. Although this is only a small sampling of cases available for study, it provides a good understanding of some of the pitfalls involved in claiming business expense deductions and substantiating business expenses.

This article will attempt to provide the reader with guidance on how each of the cases involving disallowed deductions could have been properly handled and reported by the taxpayer in order to avoid unnecessary penalties or assessments of additional tax liability.

Corporate Petitions

Churchill Downs Inc. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Travel, Meal, & Entertainment Expense Deductions in U.S. Tax Court Cases
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.