An Analysis of Factors Present in Challenged and Vacated Labor and Employment Arbitration Awards

By Jedel, Michael; Lavan, Helen et al. | Dispute Resolution Journal, November-January 2008 | Go to article overview

An Analysis of Factors Present in Challenged and Vacated Labor and Employment Arbitration Awards


Jedel, Michael, Lavan, Helen, Perkovich, Robert, Dispute Resolution Journal


A random sample of court decisions in labor and employment cases is studied to identify factors present in the legal challenge and in the cases where the award was vacated.

Arbitration has become, to a large extent, more expensive, slower and less final than it once was. Party challenges to arbitration awards in court are partly responsible for this. Certainly, these challenges reduce the certainty that the arbitral decision is final and binding, as had been negotiated by the parties. The purpose of this article is to identify the characteristics of labor and employment arbitration cases in which the losing party has challenged the award, and in particular, those cases where the award was eventually vacated, usually based on an act or omission by the arbitrator. This study adds to what we already know about awards that are vacated in that it considers more variables than earlier studies did.

Methodology

To obtain a random sample of cases for this study, we searched the LexisNexis database of litigated labor and employment law cases for cases decided between 2003-2007 that involved challenges to awards.1 The search yielded 573 cases, from which we randomly selected 101 cases to study.2 We extrapolated conclusions from the random sample, believing that they are representative of the 573 cases from which the sample was drawn.

We examined five variables in each case in the random sample: (1) the type of case, (2) the type of employer, (3) whether the plaintiff alleged one or more procedural defects, (4) whether the plaintiff alleged that the award violated the law or public policy, or other types of arbitrator misconduct-such as nondisclosure, refusal to postpone the hearing or to hear evidence, and (5) the court's rationale for vacating the award.

Type of Case. There are two types of cases in the sample: labor and employment cases. In labor cases, a labor union is either a plaintiff or a defendant. In employment cases, there is no union involvement; the parties to the dispute are the employee and the employer. Most of the cases in the sample were labor cases.

Type of Employer. There are two types of employers in the sample cases: private employers and employers in the public sector, for example, schools, libraries, police and fire departments. Both types of employers can be involved in labor and employment cases, although for the most part, public sector employers are involved in labor cases.

Court Differences. What we mean by court differences is whether the court involved is a state or federal court and whether the reviewing court is a trial court or an appellate court.

A challenge to an arbitration award usually can be brought in state court if the parties' arbitration agreement allows for enforcement in any court with jurisdiction and does not require the action to be filed in another court.

A new study by Michael H. LeRoy suggests that whether a federal or state court hears a challenge to an arbitration award is a significant factor in the result.3 He examined data in 426 federal and state court employment cases and concluded that federal district courts confirmed 92.7% of arbitrator awards, while state trial courts confirmed 78.8% of awards, a statistically significant difference. (He also found a statistically significant difference in the confirmation rate of awards at the appellate level: federal courts, 87.7%; state courts, 71.4 %.)4

To give an idea of the difference between trial and appellate courts, we only looked at the trial and appellate decisions in the federal courts.

Procedural Defect Alleged. This refers to cases in which there is a claim before the reviewing court that the lawsuit violated a rule of procedure, for example, the claim that the action was not timely filed, or was filed in the wrong district.

Violation of Law Alleged. This refers to cases in which the claimant in the arbitration alleged a violation of statutory law (for example, a federal civil rights law) and claimed arbitrator misconduct (i. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

An Analysis of Factors Present in Challenged and Vacated Labor and Employment Arbitration Awards
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.