Law Center Wins Medicare Drug Protections

By Ross, Christy | Aging Today, January/February 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Law Center Wins Medicare Drug Protections

Ross, Christy, Aging Today

Just for Elders

The following article introduces a new series in Aging Today developed with the National Senior Citizens Law Center (NSCLC). Each article will profile a legal case or legislative development affecting elders nationally. We wish to thank NSCLC's staff and, especially, the organization's executive director, Paul Nathanson, a former board president of the American Society on Aging, for creating this series.

THE CASE: Situ v. Leavitt, a national class action lawsuit regarding the Medicare Part D prescription drug program, was filed by NSCLC and the Center for Medicare Advocacy on behalf of dual eligibles, the 6.2 million low-income Medicare beneficiaries who are also eligible for Medicaid The case challenged the failure of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to protect Medicare's lowest income beneficiaries as they transition from Medicaid to Medicare prescription drug coverage.

THE PEOPLE: Dual eligibles are an extremely vulnerable group. Compared with other Medicare beneficiaries, they have lower income and more illness and, according to some estimates, they rely on an average of 10 more prescriptions. Almost 40% of them have mental or cognitive impairments, 25% live in nursing homes or other long-term care faculties, most have incomes well below the poverty level, and all are either elderly or have at least one disability.

Several individuals and two organizations with senior members brought the case as representatives of the affected class of 6.2 million low-income dual eligibles.

Plaintiff Josephine Guin, age 76, is a Florida resident and dual-eligible individual who has had monthly drug plan premiums deducted from her Social Security check even though, according to the Part D law, she should not pay a premium. She had to forgo getting needed medicine because she was asked to pay the unsubsidized co-payment, which she could not afford.

THE ISSUES: Dual eligibles were supposed to get a seamless transition from Medicaid drug coverage to Medicare drug coverage when Part D first went into effect on Jan. 1, 2006. The Medicare Modernization Act (the statute that created Part D) required the government to automatically enroll dual eligibles into Part D prescription drug plans and to deem them eligible for the low-income subsidy, a program that subsidizes the premiums, deductibles and co-payments of dual eligibles and other low-income beneficiaries.

Unfortunately, the information management system that notifies plans and pharmacies of the enrollment and lowincome status of dual eligibles has been dogged by extensive delays. As a result, many dual eligibles have struggled to obtain the medications they need at a price they can afford.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Law Center Wins Medicare Drug Protections


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?