Characteristics: Of Effective Audit Committees in Federal, State and Local Governments

By "Ted" David, Irwin T. Cgfm, Cpa | The Journal of Government Financial Management, Spring 2009 | Go to article overview

Characteristics: Of Effective Audit Committees in Federal, State and Local Governments


"Ted" David, Irwin T. Cgfm, Cpa, The Journal of Government Financial Management


The Research

The private sector financial debacles earlier in this decade resulted in sweeping corporate governance legislation known as the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 (SOX). SOX places significant new responsibilities on audit committees of public companies, including increased responsibility for external and internal audits.

While not subject to SOX, many governments have had audit committees for many years. Others have expressed interest in, initiated, expanded, modified and/or strengthened their audit committees since passage of SOX. To provide improved information on government audit committees, the objective of this research was to "identify the characteristics of effective, mature audit committees at all levels of government - local, state and federal."

The research was performed by discussion and interviews with more than 135 knowledgeable individuals, analysis of information on 35 audit committees and several onsite visits.

What We Found

While no all-encompassing legal or regulatory requirements exist for government audit committees, many governments have successfully implemented audit committees to strengthen their internal and external audit functions, internal controls, financial management, financial reporting and overall governance. The absence of requirements has enabled these governments to shape and structure their audit committees to meet their specific needs. Several governments also mandate audit committees for entities under their jurisdiction.

Several Potential Sources of Guidance

Five organizations have published guidance for the mission, structure, responsibilities, membership, activities and operations of audit committees at different levels of government:

* The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) - all governments;1

* Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T)state and local governments;2

* Department of Defense (DoD) Inspector General - DoD entities;3

* Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) - local and state governments;4

* KPMG Peat Marwick (1989)- local and state governments;5

* and KPMG LLP (2003)- federal entities.6

The research report compares key features of these guidance documents. While the guidance is similar on many subjects, it significantly differs in other areas. Some differences are explained by the level of government to which the guidance is aimed, for example committee title, mission and membership and relations with the internal and external auditors. The similarities and differences were evident in practice among the audit committees reviewed, reflecting the flexibility available to governments in establishing their own audit committees.

Several guidance publications include very helpful checklists, sample charters, sample questions and other useful guides. CPA firms and the AICPA also have websites devoted to corporate governance, including audit committees.7

Are the Committees Effective? Do They Add Value?

Since government audit committees typically do not have quantitative performance metrics, we asked interviewees whether they thought their audit committee "adds value" to their government.

With a few exceptions, most interviewees think that their audit committee is effective, meets the goals for which it was established, and improves the entity's financial management and overall governance. In several cases, however, we were told that committee effectiveness depends directly on capabilities of the committee chair and/or committee members and whether the committee included financially literate individuals. Some more frequently mentioned "values added" included:

* A Best Management Practice - A strong audit committee is a best practice to improve the entity's governance and financial management.

* Accountability and Transparency - Management accountability is enhanced by an audit committee that pays attention.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Characteristics: Of Effective Audit Committees in Federal, State and Local Governments
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.