The Circle of Assent: How "Agreement" Can Save Mandatory Arbitration in Long-Term Care Contracts

By Gaffney, Lauren | Vanderbilt Law Review, April 2009 | Go to article overview

The Circle of Assent: How "Agreement" Can Save Mandatory Arbitration in Long-Term Care Contracts


Gaffney, Lauren, Vanderbilt Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

On September 28, 1997, a resident at the Comanche Trail Nursing Center physically attacked his eighty-one-year-old roommate, Tranquilino Mendoza.1 As a result of the attack, Mr. Mendoza suffered a concussion and brain damage.2 His daughter claimed that her father was never the same after the attack and filed a lawsuit against the long-term care facility alleging negligence.3 In 2006, a jury awarded Mr. Mendoza $160 million.4

Similarly, on April 26, 2003, a resident of the Heritage House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center allegedly attacked Carolyn Mason, another resident at the same facility.5 Mrs. Mason suffered a broken hip.6 Like Mr. Mendoza, she filed a lawsuit against the long-term care facility alleging negligence.7 But instead of proceeding toward trial, Heritage House produced Mrs. Mason's seven-page admission agreement and moved to compel arbitration.8 Apparently unbeknownst to Mrs. Mason, pages five and six of the admission contract required that "any legal dispute which might arise shall be resolved exclusively by binding arbitration."9 Four years after the attack, the Mississippi Court of Appeals upheld the arbitration clause, thereby preventing Mrs. Mason from taking her case to trial.10

As a result, Mrs. Mason will argue her case in front of an arbitration panel rather than a judge and jury. If Mrs. Mason experienced abuse or neglect at Heritage House, a jury never will hear about it - she waived that right, which otherwise is guaranteed by the Constitution.11 Additionally, the public never will learn the outcome of her case12 because arbitration is generally confidential.13 Perhaps of greatest importance, Mrs. Mason lost her most valuable tools for negotiating a settlement. Because Heritage House has no reason to fear the unknown factors that play into a jury verdict, any settlement likely will be limited to compensatory damages.14 Further, damages often are capped contractually in arbitration agreements, and if they are not capped, they are generally very low for the elderly and disabled long-term care population.15 Finally, there is at least the suspicion that industry-wide arbitration tends to favor the repeat players - here the nursing homes- because arbitrators want future case referrals.16

The plight of Mrs. Mason is not uncommon. Mandatory predispute arbitration agreements are the emerging standard in longterm care ("LTC") admission contracts all around the country. The agreements are "mandatory" because arbitration is the only form of dispute resolution available to an aggrieved LTC resident when a claim arises. This form of arbitration agreement is "pre-dispute" because the resident/signer agrees to arbitrate any disputes that may arise between the parties in the future, rather than take those disputes to court. Pre-dispute arbitration agreements differ from postdispute agreements, in which parties agree to arbitrate a specific dispute after it has arisen.17 This Note refers to mandatory predispute arbitration agreements as "mandatory arbitration agreements."

As mandatory arbitration agreements are discovered by consumers and claims arise,18 questions surrounding the legality and propriety of these agreements emerge. Critics of mandatory arbitration agreements in nursing home contracts urge that these provisions are intrinsically unfair.19 Arbitration provisions in nursing home contracts generally deny the elderly and disabled the right to raise any and all claims in court.20 Exacerbating this problem is the fact that admission to a nursing home is usually a remarkably stressful event for residents and their famiUes.21 Critics worry that families admitting a loved one to a nursing home are not capable of making rational and informed legal decisions.22 For example, a typical family may not appreciate the importance of a binding arbitration agreement in an admissions packet that also includes a plethora of technical documents, including Medicare information, patient rights, advance directives, and resident conduct policies. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Circle of Assent: How "Agreement" Can Save Mandatory Arbitration in Long-Term Care Contracts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.