W. Bush's Judicial Legacy: Mission Accomplished

By Goldman, Sheldon; Schiavoni, Sara et al. | Judicature, May/June 2009 | Go to article overview

W. Bush's Judicial Legacy: Mission Accomplished


Goldman, Sheldon, Schiavoni, Sara, Slotnick, Elliot, Judicature


George W. Bush's legacy includes the appointment of like-minded Supreme Court justices and lower court judges selected by a process structured to achieve that result.

George W. Bush left the WIi i te House on January 20, 2009, with an overall legacy that is sure to be debated for some time. That legacy includes the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, a country at war on two fronts, a crushing deficit, and much unfinished business on the domestic policy front ranging from health care to tax policy. He left office with Democrat Barack Obama winning the White House in the 2008 presidential election with a decisive electoral college and popular vote margin, in marked contrast to the elections of 2000 and 2004 and with Democrats firmly in control of both houses of Congress. He left office with a presidential approval rating that, according to a CBS tracking poll, was the lowest of any president since polling began.1 Yet, George W. Bush left a judicial legacy that even his political opponents concede has had a major impact in the reshaping of the federal judiciary. Indeed, as we suggest here, his judicial legacy may well be Bush's most enduring accomplishment.

The last two years of the Bush presidency were different than his first six years. The congressional elections of 2006 saw the Republicans lose control of both houses of Congress. Ongoing crises both international and domestic no doubt took their toll on the President's ability to pursue his agenda. Democ- ratic control of the Senate, although by a slim margin, meant that it would be harder for the President to gain confirmation of his judicial nominees, especially those perceived by Democrats and liberal interest groups as too ideologically committed to an activist conservative agenda.

Nevertheless, when the last two years of the Bush presidency were over, 58 of the 79 nominees to the federal district courts and 10 of the 22 nominees to the appeals courts of general jurisdiction submitted to the 110th Congress were confirmed by the Senate. In percentages, 73 percent of the district court nominees and 46 percent of the appeals court nominees were confirmed. This was a confirmation rate that modestly exceeded the historic low rates during Clinton's last two years in office (also with an opposition controlled Congress).'2

This article continues the story of W. Bush's judicial appointments, a story that follows the format of previous articles in our biennial accounting of judicial selection during each previously completed Congress/ We pay particular attention to the demographic portrait of the Bush appointments to the lower federal courts and appointment and confirmation processes during Bush's last two years in office (that is, during the life of the 1 10th Congress). We also consider the broader question of Bush's judicial legacy.

Our sources of data include personal interviews with officials in the White House, Department of Justice, and the Senate who played a role in either the nomination or confirmation process (or both) and interest group observers who ranged across the ideological spectrum. For the demographic data on the appointees, we relied on the questionnaires that judicial nominees complete for the Senate Judiciary Committee. Other sources of demographic or background data include newspaper articles and biographical directories.4 Data on political party affiliation or preference was collected not only from the just mentioned sources but in some instances from the Registrar of Voters or Boards of Elections for the counties in which the appointees maintained their primary residence.

We first examine the selection process, particularly during the President's last two years in office, followed by a consideration of the confirmation process during this period of divided government. Subsequent sections consider the demographic portrait of the last two years' appointees to the district and appeals courts compared to the appointees from the first six years; a comparison of the nontraditional to the traditional appointees; and then a comparison of the demographic profile of the entire cohort of Bush appointees for each of those courts compared to the demographic profiles of the judiciaries of Bush's four immediate predecessors. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

W. Bush's Judicial Legacy: Mission Accomplished
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.