Science and the Psychiatric Publishing Industry

By McLaren, Niall | Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, April 1, 2009 | Go to article overview

Science and the Psychiatric Publishing Industry

McLaren, Niall, Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry

Objective: An empirical examination of the scientific status of psychiatry. Method and Results: Analysis of the publications policy of the major English-language psychiatric journals shows that no journal meets the minimum criteria for a scientific publishing policy. Conclusion: Psychiatry lacks the fundamental elements of any field claiming to be a science. Furthermore, its present policies are likely to inhibit scientific development of models of mental disorder rather than facilitate them. The psychiatric publishing industry is in urgent need of radical reform.

Keywords: psychiatric publishing; sociology of science; psychiatry as protoscience; self-deception in psychiatry

Psychiatry is part of medicine, and medicine is an applied science, therefore psychiatry is a scientific field in its own right. Very few psychiatrists would question this conclusion but, from time to time, it is appropriate to question our basic assumptions to see if they still apply. I have previously argued (McLaren, 2007) that all models used in psychiatry are invalid, meaning our field is no more than a protoscience. In particular, I have outlined a case against the attempt to explain mental disorder using biological reductionism (McLaren, 2008). Briefly, reductionism is the wrong conceptual approach to the question of human mental life. That is, the attempt to reduce mental life to matters of biology misunderstands the nature of mind, or is ontologically incorrect. My view is that since we do not have a valid model of normal mental life, or mind, we are not in a position to begin to explain disordered mental life. If we had an adequate theory of mind, then a model of mental disorder would flow from it and, hence, the correct technology for investigating and treating it. But, uniquely in medicine, we have nothing like this.

This appears contradictory: how can there be a field of science without an agreed model of what the field is about? At first glance, psychiatry has the trappings of a field of science. It has highly trained researchers working in dedicated centers, supported by government and industry grants that are allocated according to ethical processes; it has training programs, examinations, conferences, and a publishing industry. Grant procedures, courses, and so forth, evolve but the publication of scientific research is so basic to our concepts that we rarely consider it, and it has hardly changed in a hundred years. Its original purpose may have been educational but, these days, its major function is essentially epistemological, a matter of what we can rightly claim to know. Even though its applications may be covered by patents, and so forth, all basic scientific research takes place in the public domain. Theories must be free of bias, and the only way of ensuring this is to allow others to follow the arguments and to repeat the research. If there is a fault, somebody will find it. Publication serves other ends, of course, but its epistemological function is to eliminate error. Errors are discovered and corrected simply by placing the whole of the program, theories and research, before the critical audience of one's peers and the general public. Accordingly, every part of a field of science is open to challenge. Nothing is sacrosanct, not theories, models or methods, nor personalities, reputations, or ambitions. The idea that a field of science can be immune to criticism is self-contradictory, just because criticism is the only way we know of eliminating error. Indeed, criticism is the very engine of scientific progress.

As with all fields of science, psychiatry must meet certain requirements before it can be taken seriously. These include an agreed model of mental disorder (a single playing field), objectivity (a level playing field), accessibility (an open playing field), and accountability (a public playing field). In this article, I wish to examine the question of psychiatry's formal status as a scientific endeavor from two points of view. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Science and the Psychiatric Publishing Industry


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.