A Comparison of CFOs' and CPAs' Perceptions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the PCAOB

By Hill, Nancy T.; McEnroe, John E. et al. | The CPA Journal, August 2009 | Go to article overview

A Comparison of CFOs' and CPAs' Perceptions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the PCAOB


Hill, Nancy T., McEnroe, John E., Stevens, Kevin T., The CPA Journal


The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) has been in effect now for over half a decade, and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has been issuing auditing standards and guidance on how to implement those standards for nearly as long. The perceived merits, flaws, and consequences of SOX and the PCAOB have been reported and debated repeatedly in the financial press. Yet, William J. Dodwell notes ("Six Years of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Are We Better Off?' Vie CPA Journal. August 2008) that the question remains "Are we better off?" since the implementation of SOX. We have also asked ourselves this question, and it motivated us to engage in a series of research projects involving various facets of SOX and the PCAOB that may help find an answer by providing feedback from professionals who have been tasked with implementing and working with SOX.

The first survey was conducted in 2002 and the second in 2006, The results were reported in 77?^ CPA Journal (November 2005 and July 2007). Perhaps the most intriguing conclusions from me authors' third study are as follows: I ) Only a third of the CFOs and almost half of the CPAs surveyed agree that the benefits of complying with SOX section 404 are greater than me costs; 2) over half of me CFOs reported that investors and creditors have more confidence in financial statements due to SOX: and 3) CFOs overwhelmingly believe that there should be no exclusion from compliance with section 404 for any publicly traded finn, regardless of size.

The first two studies surveyed CPAs engaged in public accounting, while the current study surveyed chief financial officers (CFOs) of Fortune 500 companies. A total of 43 usable responses were received, for a response rate of 9%. (While the response rale is relatively small, CFOs are very busy individuals and many have changed positions, especially given the current financial climate. As such, the authors consider the number of responses adequate for both analysis and extrapolation.) The results are depicted in Exhibits 1-4 and focus on four areas: auditing standards, client services, financial statements, and the perceived cost and benefits of section 404.

Auditing Standards

Exhibit I relates to the PCAOB and its auditing standards and compares CFOs' 2008 responses to those from CPAs in public accounting reported in 2007. A little over half of each group stated that the PCAOB has established auditing standards in a satisfactory manner. However, less than half of each group (and only 28% of CPAs) found the PCAOB's guidance in implementation of auditing standards to be sufficient. The final item in Exhibit 1 pertains to the appropriateness of the PCAOB's one-month comment period to review and submit comments on the exposure drafts of proposed auditing standards. Only a quarter or so of both groups (CPAs and CFOs) perceived the one-month time frame to respond as sufficient.

Client Services

Exhibit 2 lists the responses of CFOs and CPAs regarding the restrictions that SOX imposes on client services when the firm also conducts the audit. In general, neither CFOs nor CPAs support auditing firms providing other client services. Furthermore. CFOs are less likely to favor the offering of nonaudit services than are CPAs in public accounting. For example, not one CFO believed that a pub- lic accounting finn should be allowed to perform bookkeeping or other services related to the client's accounting records while also performing the audit. In con- trast, nearly a quarter of the CPAs thought that providing those services should be allowed. The percentage of the CPAs who agreed that those services should be allowed (32%) was twice as large as the percentage of CFOs who agreed (16%). In addition, relatively few CFOs (16%) thought that an auditor should be allowed to perform actuarial services. In contrast, approximately a third of the CPAs thought that providing such services was appropriate. Furthermore, a scant 12% of CFOs agreed that the finn providing the external audit should also be able to provide internal auditing services. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Comparison of CFOs' and CPAs' Perceptions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the PCAOB
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.