Hunting for Hides: Deerskins, Status, and Cultural Change in the Protohistoric Appalachians

By Nassaney, Michael | Southeastern Archaeology, Summer 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Hunting for Hides: Deerskins, Status, and Cultural Change in the Protohistoric Appalachians

Nassaney, Michael, Southeastern Archaeology

Hunting for Hides: Deerskins, Status, and Cultural Change in the Protohistoric Appalachians. HEATHER A. LAPHAM. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 2005. xii + 184 pp., figs., tables, biblio., and index. $60.00 (cloth), ISBN 0-8173-1493-8; $29.95 (paperback), ISBN 0-8173-5276-7.

Reviewed by Michael Nassaney

Hunting for Hides is another welcome addition to the new scholarship that examines the ways in which native North Americans actively confronted and sometimes embraced the material and social opportunities afforded by entanglement with an expanding European economy (see also Kathleen Ehrhardt, European Metals in Native Hands, University of Alabama Press, 2005). In this book, Heather Lapham aims to evaluate how native peoples in the southern Appalachian Highlands participated in the deerskin trade by supplying hides to Euro-American merchants who came to rely on interior sources following the decline of deer populations in Atlantic coastal areas. It is not surprising that the demands of the leather industry, which led to the export of over 1 million skins from Virginia and the Carolinas from 1699 to 1715, began to have a profound impact on native primary producers even decades earlier.

Lapham begins her study, which is a revision of her dissertation completed at the University of Virginia in 2002, by discussing the relationship between economic intensification and cultural change. She contends that animal bones and mortuary remains can provide an entry point into understanding the consequences of the deerskin trade. Lapham employs anthropological theory to frame some general propositions pertaining to the sociopolitical conditions that obtain under culture change while being sensitive to the historical specificity of her case study. Some of this discussion, such as the theoretical background and the hunting for hides model, could have been developed more thoroughly in a separate chapter, but she does a good job of providing enough context to orient the reader. She uses her model to derive several explicit archaeological expectations regarding the frequency of animal remains, associated processing activities, and the distribution of prestige goods in mortuary context that are explored later in the book. The major premise is that economic intensification and the acquisition of new status symbols will be expressed in the faunal and mortuary records respectively.

The second chapter presents information on the sites selected for this study. Two precontact sites constitute a baseline from which comparisons can be made with the protohistoric Trigg site (ca. A.D. 1600-1650). Lapham does archaeology a great service by analyzing previously excavated assemblages, thus underscoring the enduring value of extant collections. She summarizes standard information on the methods of investigation (e.g., recovery techniques), site size, configuration, feature types, faunal and flora remains, and ceramic types. While most of this is useful background information, it is not clear how relevant the mostly typological ceramic data are to this study.

The methods of faunal analysis are discussed in chapter 3 with attention given to the relative merits of different quantitative measures, such as NISP, MNI, and biomass. The assemblages are generally comparable, though Lapham claims that little new information was gained by wet-screened materials from one of the early sites and therefore chooses to exclude those data. I don't think that this means that archaeologists should rely on dry screening through 1 /4-inch mesh. The rest of the chapter makes systematic comparisons among the three sites. Notably, there is evidence of increased utilization of deer during the protohistoric period, a slight increase in the harvest of other fur-bearing animals, and a decline in the use of bear. Changes in the frequencies of deer, beaver, raccoon, and fox are predicted by the hunting for hides model, though the decrease in bear bones remains unexplained.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Hunting for Hides: Deerskins, Status, and Cultural Change in the Protohistoric Appalachians


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?