Improving Institutional Effectiveness: The Relationship between Assessing Student Learning Outcomes and Strategic Planning in California Community Colleges

By Gallagher, Mary | Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview

Improving Institutional Effectiveness: The Relationship between Assessing Student Learning Outcomes and Strategic Planning in California Community Colleges


Gallagher, Mary, Journal of Applied Research in the Community College


Community colleges in California are grappling with developing and assessing student learning outcomes (SLOs), as the accrediting agency is holding them accountable for providing evidence of student learning as one measure of institutional effectiveness. One means of demonstrating accountability is to use strategic planning to direct the continuous improvement of SLOs through assessment and evaluation. A survey of 108 California community college chief instructional officers (CIOs) examined the relationship between strategic planning and assessing student learning. The response rate was 63 percent. These CIOs did not report a direct connection between strategic planning and assessing student learning as a means to fulfill institutional goals and improve institutional effectiveness. However, follow-up interviews with 12 of the 68 CIOs who responded to the survey indicated the existence of this relationship. Results from this article demonstrate the need for both quantitative and qualitative measures of the same issue to allow for multiple perspectives to arise.

Introduction

California community colleges (CCCs), with over 2.6 million students, are required to develop systems to demonstrate that students are learning. The struggle for CCCs is how to model and/ or remodel what happens in the classroom into a plan to improve student learning outcomes (SLOs) and how to assess whether the plan is improving learning and institutional effectiveness (IE). The expectation in this day and age is that not only should students possess certain skills but that they have the ability to identify and solve problems, to ascertain the impact of decisions and actions, and to appreciate that learning will be life long.

The beginning of the 21st century brought with it many changes in higher education, certainly for California community colleges. Aggressively capturing an advantage in the marketplace promotes the success of the institution through increased income and prestige. More importantly, the ability of the institution to effectively and efficiently educate and equip its students, faculty, and staff makes a crucial difference in the accomplishments of the college (Center for Student Success, 2007; Kirsch, Braun, Yamamoto «Sc Sum, 2007). The aforementioned comes with challenges.

Community colleges experience two unique challenges in planning for the improvement of their institutions. The first is that the students have varied education goals ranging from those who want to take one or two classes for personal interest, to those who want specialized vocational training and to those who are interested in transferring to a four-year college or university. The second challenge is the varied demographics of the students. The typical age range of the CCC student body is less than 29 years old (63 %) (see Table 1). That leaves 37 percent who are older than 29 years. The ethnicity of the student body state-wide is mostly White followed by Hispanic and Asian (see Table 2).

The CCCs also have the challenge of harnessing the resources, financial and human, necessary to efficiently and effectively facilitate learning within this vast array of needs, making planning for improvement particularly critical for community colleges.

Additionally, accrediting agencies are increasingly olding institutions accountable for providing improvement to their institutions, including evidence of student learning. The Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC) oversees CCCs and requires that they meet certain standards of institutional performance. ACÇJC defines student learning outcomes as the knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes that a student has attained at the end of or as the result of the engagement in a particular set of experiences in college (ACCJC, 2002). Assessment is used to gather evidence and evaluate quality of learning and progress toward benchmarks (League for Innovation in Community College, 2004). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Improving Institutional Effectiveness: The Relationship between Assessing Student Learning Outcomes and Strategic Planning in California Community Colleges
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.