Investigating the Impact of Firm Strategy-Click-and-Brick, Brick-and-Mortar, and Pure-Click-On Financial Performance

By Ko, Myung; Roztocki, Narcyz | JITTA : Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, July 2009 | Go to article overview

Investigating the Impact of Firm Strategy-Click-and-Brick, Brick-and-Mortar, and Pure-Click-On Financial Performance


Ko, Myung, Roztocki, Narcyz, JITTA : Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application


Abstract:

Building on the resource-based view, this study compares the financial performance of three different types of firms: click-and-brick (CB), traditional brick-and-mortar (BM), and pure-click (PC) firms. We select twenty-one firms from each type and examine their financial performance using profitability and cost ratio analysis for the period from 2000 to 2004. The results of our ratio analysis indicate that the average profitability and cost structure vary by firm type. Firms that conduct their business using both traditional-physical stores and the Internet achieve significantly higher profitability than comparable firms that either use only traditional-physical stores or solely rely on the Internet. Furthermore, the cost structures of the firms that conduct their business using both traditional-physical stores and the Internet appear to be comparable to the traditional firms. In contrast, the pure-click companies that rely solely on the Internet for doing business seem to experience higher overall costs. These results are of practical relevance for the managers in the pure-click firms who may face less favorable cost structures as compared to other firm types.

Keywords: E-commerce, pure-click, click-and-brick, brick-and-mortar, financial performance, resource-based view

INTRODUCTION

The Internet has transformed the way organizations conduct their business today. The number of firms that take advantage of Internet technology increased rapidly in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Subsequently, e-commerce sales increased continuously and will continue increasing, according to Forrester Research. In 2007, e-commerce sales in the U.S. reached $175 billion (excluding travel); this was a 21 percent increase from 2006. In fact, Forrester Research predicted that e-commerce sales would reach $204 billion in 2008 and $334.7 billion in 2012, a surge of growth rising approximately 14 percent annually from 2007 until 2012 (Rosencrance 2008). In contrast, the sales at physical stores are expected to grow only 2.6 percent annually for the same period.

In essence, there are three types of firms that differ in adopting the Internet to their business operations. The first type of firms are companies that operate their business transactions exclusively in an electronic online market and are heavily dependent on the Internet (Koo, Koh, and Nam 2004). These firms are called online firms, "pure plays," Internet firms, dotcoms, or "pure-click" (hereinafter refer to as PC) firms (Mahadevan 2000). These firms interact with customers solely through the Internet website and without any face-to-face contact (Enders and Jelassi 2000). In contrast to the PC firms, the second type of firms are the traditional firms, or "brick-and-mortar" (hereinafter referred to as BM) firms. The BM firms conduct only traditional business operations with physical stores and do not use the Internet as the means of e-commerce. These firms have only face-to-face contact with their customers via physical locations. The websites of these firms, if present, are used to disseminate information about the firm, the firm's products and/or services, and the firm's physical locations (Saeed, Grover, and Hwang 2003). The third type of firms, "click-and-mortar," also referred to as "click-and-brick" firms, (hereinafter referred to as CB) conduct their business using both means: traditional physical stores and the Internet. Accordingly, firms can be classified based on physical locations, e-commerce capability, and the degree of Internet usage as summarized in Table 1.

Since CB firms can wield the strength of both BM and PC firms, at first look, the CB firm type appears to be the most promising one in achieving better financial performance than the BM approach or PC approach. While there are a number of previous studies that have focused on each type of firm or the transformation from BM to CM firm (Bellman 2001; Ranganathan, Goode, and Ramaprasad 2003; Razi, Tarn, and Siddiqui 2004; Venkatraman 2000), there is little empirical research that has investigated whether financial performance of CB firms are, indeed, superior to firms that conduct their business exclusively online or only by utilizing traditional physical stores. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Investigating the Impact of Firm Strategy-Click-and-Brick, Brick-and-Mortar, and Pure-Click-On Financial Performance
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.