Gross V. Fbl Financial Services, Inc.: Supreme Court Radically Changes the Ground Rules for Proving Adea Claims

By Bible, Jon D.; Sanders, Donald | Labor Law Journal, Fall 2009 | Go to article overview

Gross V. Fbl Financial Services, Inc.: Supreme Court Radically Changes the Ground Rules for Proving Adea Claims


Bible, Jon D., Sanders, Donald, Labor Law Journal


I. Introduction

In June, 2009, the United States Supreme Court issued a controversial 5-4 decision involving the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 [ADEA],2 which prohibits an employer from taking an adverse employment action against an employee "because of such individual's age."3 Gross v. FLB Financial Services, Inc.4 was a mixed-motives disparate treatment case, in which both discriminatory and legitimate factors allegedly accounted for FBL's decision to demote a 54-year-old employee.5 Speaking for the five conservative Justices,6 Justice Clarence Thomas rejected the argument that the analytical formula that applies in mixed-motives cases brought under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act7 also applies in ADEA cases. Under that formula, if the plaintiff proves that discrimination was a motivating factor in an adverse action, the burden shifts to the employer to prove that it would have made the same decision absent that factor. In Gross, Thomas held that the burden of proof stays with ADEA plaintiffs throughout the litigation. He further held that a plaintiff can prevail only if he proves that his age was not just a motivating factor, but ¿Ae reason - the "but-for" cause, as Thomas termed it - behind the adverse action he suffered. As we shall discuss, although it is not clear what Thomas had in mind in articulating this standard, there can be little doubt that after Gross, ADEA plaintiffs will find it more difficult to win - which, we submit, is exactly the result that the majority desired.

II. Background

A. Facts

Jack Gross worked for the FBL Financial Group, Inc. [FBL] for many years, eventually attaining the position of Claims Administration Vice President. In 2003, in an internal reorganization, he became Claims Project Coordinator and many of his duties were shifted to a new position that was given to a woman in her early forties. While both received the same pay, Gross saw this as a demotion, arguing that the woman's position was the functional equivalent of his former position and that his new role was ill-defined and lacked a job description or specific duties. In April, 2004, Gross sued FBL under the ADEA, contesting the 2003 "demotion."8

In the district court, Gross argued that his age accounted for this job action. FBL countered that the action was part of a legitimate corporate restructuring and that Gross's new position was better suited to his skills. At the close of trial, the court instructed the jury that Gross had the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that FBL demoted him to Claims Project Coordinator in 2003 and that his age was a motivating factor in that decision, but that its verdict should be for FBL if FBL proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it would have demoted Gross regardless of his age. The jury returned a verdict for Gross, awarding him $46,945 in lost compensation.9

FBL challenged the latter instruction on ap- peal, with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit concluding that under the 1989 Supreme Court decision in Price Wa- terhouse v. Hopkins,10 the burden of proof shifts to the employer only if the plaintiff presents direct evidence that an illegitimate criterion was a substantial factor in the employment decision.11 The jury instruction was flawed because it al- lowed this burden to shift to FBL on a showing of any such evidence. Accordingly, the appeals court vacated the decision and remanded the case for a new trial.12

The Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether a plaintiff must present direct evidence of age discrimination to obtain a mixed-motives jury instruction. When he confronted the merits of the case, however, Thomas decided that the threshold question was whether the burden of proof ever shifts to the employer in an ADEA case. Because it does not, he found, the directevidence question that the Court took the case to decide was effectively moot.13

B.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Gross V. Fbl Financial Services, Inc.: Supreme Court Radically Changes the Ground Rules for Proving Adea Claims
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.