Evolution of Judicial Careers in the Federal Courts, 1789-2008

By Fournet, Monique Renée; Kopko, Kyle C. et al. | Judicature, September/October 2009 | Go to article overview

Evolution of Judicial Careers in the Federal Courts, 1789-2008


Fournet, Monique Renée, Kopko, Kyle C., Wittmer, Dana, Baum, Lawrence, Judicature


In the past few decades, some signs of change in the judicial careers of federal judges have appeared. The most widely noted has been the strong tendency to recruit Supreme Court nominees from the ranks of sitting federal judges. After the selection of Sandra Day O'Con- nor every Court nominee except Harriet Miers has come from the federal courts of appeals, and opponents cited Miers's lack of judicial experience as a reason to deny her a seat on the Court.1 Since the Miers episode, the nominations of Samuel Alito in 2005 and Sonia Sotomayor in 2009 have reinforced the pat- tern of choosing court of appeals judges to fill Supreme Court vacan- cies. Meanwhile, studies of federal judges have found evidence that judges appointed to the district courts and courts of appeals have more prior experience in thejudiciary than in the past.2

These signs of change led Judge Richard Posner to observe that " [w] e may be evolving toward the European system of a career judiciary...."3 That observation can be understood in terms of the distinction between a career judiciary and what Nicholas Georgakopoulos called the "recognition judiciary" of common-law countries such as the U.S.4 In a career judiciary, found in many civil-code countries such as France or Germany, lawyers move into lower levels of the judiciary early in their careers, and (to the extent they are successful) they move upward to higher courts over urne. Often the highest court stands outside this system, but with that exception the judiciary resembles a bureaucracy in the patterns of selection and promotion.

To varying degrees, common-law countries depart from the model of a career judiciary.' The federal judiciary of the U.S. fits the model of a recognition judiciary well; judges come to the courts not at the start of their legal careers but after serving in other legal and nonlegal positions, and they usually become federal judges relatively late in their professional lives. There is no fixed career ladder within the federal judiciary, and most judges on the district courts and courts of appeals do not win promotion to a higher court.'1

Given this tradition of a recognition judiciary in the federal courts, any movement toward a career judiciary would be intriguing. Undoubt- edly, as Judge Posner noted, we are still a long way from the civil law model.7 But there may be a significant movement in the direction of a career judiciary, one in which federal judgeships occupy a larger portion of judges' legal careers and judges move upward more systematically through the federal courts.

If this change is indeed occurring, it may be consequential. To the extent that the federal courts move from the model of a recognition judiciary to a career judiciary, that change could affect the perspectives and behavior of federal judges. When promotions through the ranks of judges are common, judges who are interested in promotion may have incentives to rule in ways that presidents and senators favor." And a Supreme Court whose members all served on lower courts may act differently from one whose members have a wider array of backgrounds. For instance, the Court collectively may be more closely oriented to the legal system and less cognizant of the practical consequences of its decisions than it would be if the justices were more diverse in their backgrounds.''

The possible effects of the promotional path from the courts of appeals to the Supreme Court have been a matter of concern for some commentators.1" Indeed, since the Clinton administration there has been considerable interest in diversifying the Court with members who come from fields other than the judiciary. That interest was reflected in President Obama's inclusion of two lawyers without judicial experience among the four candidates whom he interviewed as potential successors to Justice David Souter."

Significant as appointments to the Supreme Court are, we are concerned with a broader question, the extent to which the federal judiciary as a whole has moved toward a career judiciary. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Evolution of Judicial Careers in the Federal Courts, 1789-2008
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.