Are People Really More Patient Than Other Animals? Evidence from Human Discounting of Real Liquid Rewards

By Jimura, Koji; Myerson, Joel et al. | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2009 | Go to article overview

Are People Really More Patient Than Other Animals? Evidence from Human Discounting of Real Liquid Rewards


Jimura, Koji, Myerson, Joel, Hilgard, Joseph, Braver, Todd S., Green, Leonard, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review


In previous studies, researchers have found that humans discount delayed rewards orders of magnitude less steeply than do other animals. Humans also discount smaller delayed reward amounts more steeply than larger amounts, whereas animals apparently do not. These differences between humans and animals might reflect differences in the types of rewards studied and/or the fact that animals actually had to wait for their rewards. In the present article, we report the results of three experiments in which people made choices involving liquid rewards delivered and consumed after actual delays, thereby bridging the gap between animal and human studies. Under these circumstances, humans, like animals, discounted the value of rewards delayed by seconds; however, unlike animals, they still showed an effect of reward amount. Human discounting was well described by the same hyperboloid function that has previously been shown to describe animal discounting of delayed food and water rewards, as well as human discounting of real and hypothetical monetary rewards.

Daily life often requires choices between rewards that differ on multiple dimensions. One common situation involves choosing between a larger delayed reward and a smaller reward that is available sooner. In such situations, the subjective value of a reward is typically inversely related to the delay until its receipt-a phenomenon termed delay discounting. Such discounting of delayed rewards has been observed in a wide range of species, including pigeons and rats (Green, Myerson, Holt, Slevin, & Estle, 2004; Richards, Mitchell, de Wit, & Seiden, 1997), monkeys (Stevens, Hallinan, & Hauser, 2005; Woolverton, Myerson, & Green, 2007), and humans (for a review, see Green & Myerson, 2004), suggesting that delay discounting is a fundamental aspect of decision making.

The decrease in the subjective value (V) of a reward as the delay (D) until its receipt increases is well described by a hyperboloid function:

V = A/(1 + kD)^sup s^, (1)

where A represents the amount of delayed reward, k is a constant governing how steeply the reward is discounted, and s is a nonlinear scaling parameter (Green & Myerson, 2004). Although Equation 1 describes discounting by both human and nonhuman animals, two notable differences have emerged. First, animals discount delayed rewards very steeply, so that even rewards that are delayed by as little as several seconds are judged to be of much less value than is an immediate reward. In humans, discounting effects are typically observed on time scales that are orders of magnitude longer (e.g., weeks or months vs. seconds). Second, humans show a magnitude effect, discounting smaller reward amounts more steeply than larger amounts, whereas no such magnitude effect has been observed in previous studies with animals (e.g., Freeman, Green, Myerson, & Woolverton, 2009; Green et al., 2004; Mazur, 2000).

These apparent differences between humans and animals, however, might be attributable to the types of rewards studied and/or to the fact that animals actually experienced having to wait for real rewards. Consistent with this interpretation, humans show steeper discounting when making decisions about directly consumable rewards (e.g., candy, soda, beer) as opposed to monetary rewards, perhaps because money is fungible or because it is not a primary reinforcer (Estle, Green, Myerson, & Holt, 2007; Odum & Rainaud, 2003). For example, Estle et al. found that the subjective value of 40 cans of soda decreased by 50% when receiving them was delayed by 6 months, whereas it took three times as long (18 months) for the subjective value of $40 to show a similar decline. Nevertheless, even with consumable rewards, the discounting function for humans in these studies was still much shallower than that observed in animals, suggesting greater patience. However, the rewards and delays in these previous studies were always hypothetical. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Are People Really More Patient Than Other Animals? Evidence from Human Discounting of Real Liquid Rewards
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.