Could Question Time Be More Than Just a Bunfight?

By Pyne, Christopher | Review - Institute of Public Affairs, December 2009 | Go to article overview

Could Question Time Be More Than Just a Bunfight?


Pyne, Christopher, Review - Institute of Public Affairs


Question time could be an important part of democracy, writes Christopher Pyne. But it isn't right now.

Everyone is a critic these days. Everyone is a journalist, everyone is a commentator. You just need an internet connection. There are pages and pages of internet sites that allow feedback, commentary and discussion about every imaginable topic. And for better or for worse, you can remain virtually anonymous.

If the mainstream media isn't interested you can make a video, post it on YouTube, link it to Twitter, Facebook, MySpace - and who knows, it might go Viral'. A recent speech by Daniel Hannan, a UK Conservative Member of the European Parliament, was forwarded to me via email a couple of months ago, entitled the 'Devalued Prime Minister of a Devalued Government'. It currently has had more than 2.7 million views. Not bad for a back-bench politician.

It seems many Australians are engaging in political commentary, contributing to the debate online, but it does beg the question: Why does parliamentary question time lag behind?

Current figures show that the household viewing audience for the 2 p.m. screening of question time is currently just 0.3 per cent of the population.

Admittedly question time does have some tough competition. Ready Steady Cook and Days of Our Lives, both in the same time slot offer something that question time can never compete with. Pvecipes and story lines where heiresses are regularly kidnapped and buried alive are more compelling.

So has question time become irrelevant? In the Australian federal parliamentary system, question time remains the only opportunity in the House of Pvepresentatives for members to directly ask questions of the Prime Minister and government frontbench where the government is compelled to answer. The problem is relevance of a particular answer is widely defined.

If I were to ask a question to the Deputy Prime Minister about a specific school being forced to accept a new school hall, when it already has a perfectly serviceable school hall, Ms Gillard would speak widely on the government education programs, this being considered of relevance to the question asked. This makes for a tedious and frustrating question time.

So why would viewers tune in? To see government held to account for its policies? To witness democracy in action?

The government has the numbers in the House of Representatives to defeat any motion. The standing orders favour ministers who are able to make long speeches without rebuttal.

In 2008 the figures indicate that the government spent only 3 1 per cent of question time answering questions from the opposition and independent members. In fact the average time the government takes to answer opposition questions is two minutes and thirty-eight seconds. The average time the government takes to answer their own questions is five minutes and ten seconds.

The reality is that in today's 24-hour media cycle, a withering remark or put down is most likely to make the evening news, but insults are never relevant to questions asked and are always outside the standing orders.

Most sitting days deliver a stream of feedback by email or phone messages from the people who watch parliament. More than any other criticism about question time, people consistently say the government has settled into a holding pattern where they ignore opposition questions, and use Government questions to deliver long dull set-piece speeches sometimes with a smattering of pre-planned gags, prerehearsed flourishes and silly props.

The former government unquestionably also used government questions (nicknamed 'dorothy dixers after an American agony aunt who allegedly made up the questions she answered in print) to push a policy into the spotlight or question an opposition position on an issue (as did the government before that) but this government has taken question time proceedings to a new low. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Could Question Time Be More Than Just a Bunfight?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.