Shareholder Democracy and the Sec's Proxy Rules: In the Boardroom

By Cane, Marilyn B.; Silva, Stacey L. | Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, January 1, 2009 | Go to article overview

Shareholder Democracy and the Sec's Proxy Rules: In the Boardroom


Cane, Marilyn B., Silva, Stacey L., Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law


I. INTRODUCTION

Although shareholder activism has progressed in recent years, the 2008 financial crisis confirms the need for further changes.1 The legal structure underpinning contemporary American corporate governance has failed shareholders. "[T]here are still problems in exercising basic shareholder rights in many U.S. listed companies, because shareholders often have limited influence over the election of their board members" wrote the chief of the investment arm of Norway's central bank in a letter to S.E.C. Chairman Christopher Cox.2

Two prominent examples, Enron and Lehman Brothers, highlight the status quo's problems. The failure of Enron's board of directors to safeguard shareholders contributed to the company's collapse. In its 2002 report, the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations concluded that Enron's board allowed the company:

[T]o engage in high risk accounting, inappropriate conflict of interest transactions, extensive undisclosed off-the-books activities, and excessive executive compensation. The board [also] witnessed numerous indications of questionable practices by Enron management over several years, but chose to ignore them to the detriment of Enron shareholders, employees and business associates.3

There was reason to be optimistic about governance changes in Enron's aftermath.4 The current financial crisis, however, has revealed the extent to which corporate boards of directors continue to fail shareholders. Lehman Brothers' board of directors took a "leisurely approach to overseeing the risk decisions and standards" which led to the firm's September 2008 bankruptcy. Moreover, Lehman's board was "content with a governance structure that concentrated power effectively in the hands of the CEO" and "apparently [saw] no need for a change in its own governance, or that of top management either. It took a bet that its approach would work and it lost big time . . ."5 These episodes illustrate the dangers of inattentive and enfeebled boards of directors.

A director owes a fiduciary duty to the company's shareholders to oversee corporate management.6 Accordingly, shareholders should play the leading role in selecting a board charged with representing their interests. Shareholders elect the board of directors through a proxy card which allows investors to vote without actually attending the shareholder meeting.7 In the rare situations where the current board members have not re-nominated themselves, the only nominees found on the proxy ballot are those chosen by the company's management.8 If a shareholder wants to suggest a nominee for the board election, the shareholder must cover the expense of complying with complex SEC regulations and mail separate ballots to shareholders.9

This process undermines shareholder democracy. In reality, the nomination process for the board of directors is controlled by management. The interests of a director who owes their position on the board to the corporation's executives are in conflict with the company's shareholders.10 The situation is exacerbated when the company's chief executive officer is an influential board member or chairperson.11 A nomination usually results in election since board elections are often uncontested. 12

One prominent shareholder rights advocacy group, the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME), urged shareholders to press companies to adopt bylaws which would grant shareholders' board nominees direct access to the proxy ballot. Shareholders nominees would reach all of the company's shareholders without imposing on the shareholder the costs of a potentially expensive proxy battle.13 AFSCME also challenged the interpretation of SEC Rule 14a-8(i)(8),14 which states that a company may exclude a shareholder proposal in the company's proxy statement "[i]f the proposal relates to a nomination or an election for membership on the company's board of directors or analogous governing body or a procedure for such nomination or election", in court. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Shareholder Democracy and the Sec's Proxy Rules: In the Boardroom
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.