Interpersonal Relations at Work Perceived by Croatian and Worldwide Employees and by Different Age, Gender, Education, Hierarchical and Company Size Groups - Empirical Evidence

By Vokic, Nina Poloski; Hernaus, Tomislav | Management : Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, January 1, 2005 | Go to article overview

Interpersonal Relations at Work Perceived by Croatian and Worldwide Employees and by Different Age, Gender, Education, Hierarchical and Company Size Groups - Empirical Evidence


Vokic, Nina Poloski, Hernaus, Tomislav, Management : Journal of Contemporary Management Issues


Workplaces benefit if workers have good relationships. In other words, in years when people are said to be the only true competitive advantage, it is evident that interpersonal relations in organizations and processes of nourishing them have become essential for the organizational success. The purpose of this article was to concisely explain the importance, types and ways of improving interpersonal relations at work, as well as to explore if, and to what extent, interpersonal relations at work are influenced by employees' backgrounds. The demographic characteristics of employees that were expected to influence their perceptions of interpersonal relations were: the country of origin, age, gender, educational level, hierarchical level, and the size of the company for which they work. The correlation analysis showed that the "country of origin" does influence interpersonal relations at work. Precisely, interpersonal relations in Croatia are, according to the respondents' perceptions, not as good as in other countries involved in the study. For example, Croatian employees perceive the working atmosphere around them as significantly less positive in comparison with the respondents from other countries, they are significantly less frequently consulted by their superiors and rarely praised, and their superiors spend significantly less time with them. However, the research revealed that other demographic characteristics are not of significant influence, either on the overall perceptions of interpersonal relations, or on the perceptions of superior - subordinate or peer relations.

1. INTRODUCTION

As work becomes more complex and collaborative, companies where people work together best have a competitive edge.

Daniel Goleman

In the closing years of the 20th century, management has come to accept that people, and not cash, buildings, or equipment, are the critical differentiators of a business enterprise. As we move into the new millennium and find ourselves in a knowledge economy, it is undeniable that people are the profit lever. All the assets of an organization, other than people, are inert. They are passive resources that require human applications to generate value (Fitz-enz, 2000).

Moreover, the rules of work are changing. People are being judged by a new yardstick: not just by how smart they are, or by their training and expertise, but also by how well they handle themselves and each other (Goleman, 1998). In addition to technical skills, the three most highly sought-after skills in new employees are increasingly oral communication, interpersonal abilities and teamwork abilities (Goleman, 1998). A study of what corporations are seeking in the MBAs they hire yields a similar list. The three most desired capabilities are communication skills, interpersonal skills, and initiative (Goleman, 1998).

This is where interpersonal relations come to play. Since we can see organizations as networks of connected people and as compositions of relationships, a large portion of work performance is tied to the establishment and maintenance of interpersonal connections. The quality of these connections has a great impact on people's ability to get work accomplished and on the functioning of the organization as a whole (Worline et al. in Lord et al. (eds.), 2002). As EEO Trust Survey (Charted Accountants Journal, 2004) found, 81% of respondents think that they are more productive at work if they have good personal relationships because they feel better. In other words, workplaces benefit if workers have good relationships.

However, in reality we frequently cope with the opposite. At work, people regularly deal with people they dislike (Linder, 1994), with difficult people (Accounting Department Management Report, 2003) such as aggressive or conflicting people, or with problem people, for instance overly shy, introvert and non-sociable people. The impact of such people on working efficiency and effectiveness is enormous. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Interpersonal Relations at Work Perceived by Croatian and Worldwide Employees and by Different Age, Gender, Education, Hierarchical and Company Size Groups - Empirical Evidence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.