Soft Regulations in Pharmaceutical Policy Making: An Overview of Current Approaches and Their Consequences

By Wettermark, Björn; Godman, Brian et al. | Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, September 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Soft Regulations in Pharmaceutical Policy Making: An Overview of Current Approaches and Their Consequences

Wettermark, Björn, Godman, Brian, Jacobsson, Bengt, Haaijer-Ruskamp, Flora M., Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

It is a challenge to improve public health and satisfy the needs of a population within limited resources. National healthcare policies seek to balance many conflicting demands such as the need to limit growth in expenditure whilst still allowing the population to have rapid access to new innovative and expensive technologies. Policy making in healthcare is highly politicized and involves many players, including healthcare professionals, the pharmaceutical industry, patients and a variety of stakeholders at the local, regional and national level. We believe that this calls for new forms of governance and approaches in addition to those traditionally applied. Increasing pressures on resources also enhance the need to learn from other areas of society. The pressures on pharmaceutical expenditure are well known and include increased volumes with an aging population and growing prevalence of chronic diseases, stricter management targets, and the continued launch of new expensive drugs costing $US50 000-100 000 per patient per year or more.[1-5] This situation becomes even more challenging and imperative to progress given the current severe economic difficulties.

This article describes the characteristics of the traditional educational, organizational, financial and regulatory methods to influence healthcare professionals. It also presents the theoretical framework behind new modes of governance, i.e. the 'soft regulations', as the first step in developing new demand-side reforms. The paper focuses on pharmaceuticals, since drug prescribing is one of the most important processes in healthcare with costs increasing faster than other aspects of care.[1,6-8] Furthermore, pharmaceutical policy making is driven by both professional and market forces, sometimes strengthening each other, at other times clashing.

We hope this opinion article initiates the debate to develop new methods to enhance the quality and efficiency of healthcare, given growing pressures. These are urgently needed without resorting to other measures such as additional supply-side controls, including very strict clinical and economic criteria for granting premium prices for new drugs, reference pricing across all therapeutic classes as well as stringent price-volume agreements and price cuts, which may not be in the best interest of key stakeholder groups.

To initiate this debate, the paper lists a number of demand-side approaches and concerns. This opinion piece focuses principally on Europe, as this reflects the authors' considerable research experience. The examples are, however, increasingly relevant to the US with its growing public expenditure on health and ongoing demand-side initiatives to ensure the significant proportion of GDP spent on healthcare[9] produces value for all key stakeholder groups. The examples of initiatives in this article are based mainly on a MEDLINE literature search of studies published between 2000 and 2008, using the following search terms: 'pharmaceuticals', 'drugs', 'reforms', 'regulations', 'expenditure', 'guidelines' and 'rational prescribing'. This search was supplemented by additional papers known to the authors, who are active in different research teams representing various disciplines including clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, business economics, health policy and social sciences. It is, however, important to stress that this paper is not a systematic review or critical appraisal documenting methodologies, findings and conclusions. Consequently, the paper should be seen as an opinion paper, which we hope will stimulate debate to guide future research and activities.

1. Traditional Models for Influencing Behaviour of Healthcare Professionals

Stakeholders across Europe and the US use a variety of methods to influence physicians' and patients' behaviour. The main strategies can be abbreviated to the 'four Es': Education, Engineering, Economics and Enforcement (table I).[10,11]

Table I.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Soft Regulations in Pharmaceutical Policy Making: An Overview of Current Approaches and Their Consequences


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?