Every Periphery Is Its Own Center: Sociopolitical and Economic Interactions in Nineteenth-Century Northwestern Ghana*

By Swanepoel, Natalie | The International Journal of African Historical Studies, September 1, 2009 | Go to article overview

Every Periphery Is Its Own Center: Sociopolitical and Economic Interactions in Nineteenth-Century Northwestern Ghana*


Swanepoel, Natalie, The International Journal of African Historical Studies


Introduction

Interactions between the raiders and the raided of West African history can be studied at a variety of scales. These interactions are often presented as flowing out of the regional systems personified by a center-periphery approach where labor (in this case enforced), and other economic resources flow from decentralized societies in the periphery to politically centralized societies at the center.1 In many large-scale, regional analyses of the slave trade in West Africa, the primary emphasis thus tends to fall on the role of the state, which is constructed in opposition to its political, economic, and social other: decentralized or "acephalous" societies.2 This emphasis on the state, a factor of scale, goes some way towards describing interactions between state-level and other societies within the West African sub-continent, but does not aid in understanding the events and processes which played out in the so-called periphery. Further, it fails to sufficiently account for the observable complexity of relations that exist between different groups in these regions.3 In addition, many of these regional approaches tend to subordinate political, cultural and social relations to the economy. An economic sub-text tends to prevail where the relationship between slave-raiders and the raided is conceptualized as being one of a resource subject to exploitation.4 This exploitative relationship is seen to result in a situation of structured inequality between groups within the same economic system,5 and tends to reduce groups in what is regarded as the economic periphery to non-actors, ignoring the role that they played in shaping interactions with other polities.

In this paper I draw on archaeological, historical, and oral evidence to explore the complexity in what some might categorize as the slave-raiding periphery of northwestern Ghana (this is expanded upon below). The latter half of the nineteenth century in northern Ghana was a period rife with uncertainty and insecurity and has been described as one of the most intense periods of slave-raiding in this part of West Africa.6 Despite the near demise of the trans-Atlantic slave trade by the 1860s, the internal trade within many parts of Africa continued up until the early years of the twentieth century. The populations most affected by this ongoing trade in northern Ghana were those in decentralized societies.7 Decentralized here refers to the so-called "acephalous" societies made famous by early anthropologists,8 which were generally characterized by a level of government that did not supersede that of the village. Leadership roles were fulfilled by a variety of individuals including elders and "big men," but the abuse of power was most likely kept in check by the democratic forces inherent within settlements that contain a number of different lineage groups.

There now exists a considerable body of historical,9 archaeological,10 and anthropological11 work on the manner in and degree to which decentralized societies were affected by both the Trans-Atlantic and domestic West African slave trades. These studies examine the impact of raiding and other slave procurement strategies on the history, social organization, and culture of decentralized groups. These were the communities that were often most affected by the slave trade and slave warfare as they were targeted by neighboring states. They were not, however, passive components in this process. As much of the literature highlights, decentralization is a dynamic and flexible form of social organization that allows societies to shift back and forth between a number of political formulations: lineage headship, village headship, regional chiefship, kingship, and so on, albeit only temporarily.12 In these kinds of societies, individuals and communities access networks of power that are organized around the control of particular resources. Such resources are not only economic in nature, but may include social and political alliances, as well as information. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Every Periphery Is Its Own Center: Sociopolitical and Economic Interactions in Nineteenth-Century Northwestern Ghana*
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.