Standards, Practices, and Methods for the Use of Administrative Claims Data
Robst, John, Boothroyd, Roger, Stiles, Paul, Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research
ABSTRACT
Administrative data are attractive sources of information in research and evaluation studies for numerous reasons including relatively low cost, and the availability of longitudinal information and large subject pools. While many professional organizations set standards for members, there exists a patchwork of practices for researchers to follow when performing research. The purpose of this paper is to outline standards and practices for researchers, and to discuss common analysis issues related to the proper use of administrative data. The discussion focuses on data from the two largest United States government-funded health care programs, Medicare and Medicaid. This ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Standards, Practices, and Methods for the Use of Administrative Claims Data.
Contributors: Robst, John - Author, Boothroyd, Roger - Author, Stiles, Paul - Author.
Journal title: Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research.
Volume: 10.
Issue: 2
Publication date: May 1, 2009.
Page number: 19+.
© The DreamCatchers Group, LLC 2007.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset