"A Poor Relation?"* Reflections on a Panel Discussion Comparing Property Rights to Other Rights Enumerated in the Bill of Rights

By Dyal-Chand, Rashmi | The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, March 2008 | Go to article overview

"A Poor Relation?"* Reflections on a Panel Discussion Comparing Property Rights to Other Rights Enumerated in the Bill of Rights


Dyal-Chand, Rashmi, The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal


Introduction

The purpose of this Essay is to summarize and reflect upon the second panel discussion at the Third Annual Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference at William & Mary School of Law, October 6-7, 2006. The panel was entitled "Comparing the Treatment of Property Rights to the Protections Given to Other Rights Under the Bill of Rights." As described by Professor Eric Kades, the organizer of the conference, the panel's topic was inspired by a statement by Justice Rehnquist in the case of Dolan v. City ofTigard: "We see no reason why the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, as much a part of the Bill of Rights as the First Amendment or Fourth Amendment, should be relegated to the status of a poor relation . . . ."! By virtue of their location in the Bill of Rights are the property rights embodied in the Fifth Amendment as important as the other rights in the BuI of Rights?2 Are they somehow even more important? Are there any textual or other reasons to treat these rights differently from other rights in the Bill of Rights? These were among the questions addressed by the panel participants and the thoughtful discussion that followed their presentations.

This Essay will proceed as follows. Part I will summarize the major points raised by each of the panelists. It is important to note at the outset that this summary is not an attempt to capture everything that each of the panelists said. Indeed, many important details and subtleties will be omitted here. Nor does it necessarily reflect the points each speaker emphasized. Rather, I seek in this Part to draw out common themes among the panelists. Part I will also summarize the discussion that followed the presentations. Part II will explicate and reflect upon some of the major themes that were raised.

I. SUMMARY

A. The Panelists

1. James W. Ely, Jr., Milton R. Underwood Chair in Free Enterprise, Professor of Law, Professor of History, Vanderbilt University Law School

Professor Ely, who was the recipient of this year's Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Prize for his numerous critically acclaimed books and articles on property rights, emphasized that property rights receive secondary treatment compared to other rights in the Bill of Rights. On the basis of his extensive historical research, Professor Ely concluded that the Framers of the Constitution of the United States and the thirteen original states did not draw distinctions in priority between economic and personal rights.3 In The Guardian of Every Other Right, Professor Ely elaborates on this point: "[T]he Framers saw property ownership as a buffer protecting individuals from governmental coercion. Arbitrary redistributions of property destroyed liberty, and thus the Framers hoped to restrain attacks on property rights."4 According to Professor Ely, the Framers were concerned that, without property rights, it would be impossible to attain these important personal rights.5

Professor Ely also commented that the views of the Framers of the U.S. Constitution, as well as those of the original thirteen states, are not mainstream views today.6 Instead, judicial, legislative, and public opinion today appears to prioritize personal rights over economic rights.7 Professor Ely documents this shift extensively in The Guardian of Every Other Right. He describes, for example, the push after World War ? "to secure equal rights for racial minorities and the campaigns for environmental and consumer protection" which "further restricted the use of property and economic liberty."8 He concludes that "[a]s the network of economic regulations grew more intrusive, there was an erosion of individual property rights."9 In that respect, he argues, contemporary mainstream views of property rights are not true to history.

2. Gideon Kanner, Counsel, Manatí, Phelps & Phillips and Professor Emeritus, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

Professor Kanner, an experienced appellate attorney and eminent domain expert who has represented property owners in a number of cases before the United States and California Supreme Courts, argued that property rights receive "disparate" treatment from other rights in the Bill of Rights.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

"A Poor Relation?"* Reflections on a Panel Discussion Comparing Property Rights to Other Rights Enumerated in the Bill of Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.