End-of-Life Decision Making: A Slippery Slope

By Caldwell, Charmaine D.; Freeman, Stephen J. | Journal of Professional Counseling, Practice, Theory, & Research, Fall 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

End-of-Life Decision Making: A Slippery Slope

Caldwell, Charmaine D., Freeman, Stephen J., Journal of Professional Counseling, Practice, Theory, & Research

Advances in medical technology have changed how we view and ultimately define death. What it means to be terminally ill, now more than ever, raises difficult moral/ethical questions for all concerned. These changes have created a new role and associated challenges for counselors as active participants in the end-of-life decision making process. This article explores ethical issues and trends in social policies that relate to challenges faced by counselors in negotiating the slippery slope that is end-of-life decision making.

End-of-life decisions are about one's ability to (in-part) control when and how their death occurs, to exercise certain rights regarding their life. In this day of biological revolution and scientific advancement in health care, the possibility of dying a peaceful death with a sense of having some control to stop the anguish resulting from prolonging the inevitable has become a public and legal debate instead of the intimately personal choice of the individual. Types of decisions to be made, the psychological landscape of the terminally ill, some ethical issues to consider, and roles for counselors in end-of-life decision making are presented in the following information.

Decisions about medical treatment that determine the time and nature of a person's death engender strong emotions in health care and other professionals and in families of the terminally ill. These decisions raise difficult moral/ethical questions for all concerned. Can decision to legally end an individual's life, even though he or she has an irreversible diagnosis of eminent death, place society on the slippery slope of no return when these decisions are routinely made or that a reverence for natural death will be jeopardized? Counselors must be aware of the precedence established when decisions of this nature are made, and must, as far as possible, make certain that the decisions made are best for all concerned.

Ethical codes across helping disciplines do not provide consistent and adequate guidelines for mental health counselors, social workers, or psychologists. At times they can be both in conflict as well as in concert with one another often providing confusing guidelines instead of clarifying ways to make difficult decisions such as those encountered when death is inevitable. For instance, the National Association of Social Workers (NASW, n. d.) does not take a position concerning the morality of end-of-life decisions but affirms the right of the individual to determine the level of his or her care. Social workers have the option to participate in or not to participate in diseussions concerning end-of-life decisions, At the same time it is deemed inappropriate for them to participate in the commission of an act of assisted suicide. The Code of Ethics espoused by the American Counseling Association (ACA) is similar to that of the NASW Both codes of ethics can be in conflict as well as in agreement with one another adding to the complexities of use and interpretation,

The ACA's 2005 Code of Ethics for the first time includes a section (A.9.a) that addresses end-of-life care for terminally ill clients. Counselors are to enable clients to obtain high quality care for physical, social, emotional, and spiritual needs; to help clients exercise self-determination given the circumstances; to see that the client has appropriate information so that they can be included in informed decision making regarding their end-of-life care, and to see that the client is assessed by a qualified mental health professional for competency in decision making. Section A.9.b includes the statement that counselors have the option to either work or not work with the terminally ill client who may wish to investigate their end-of-life options, and are to provide appropriate referral information so that the client can receive assistance with these decisions.

There are many new challenges for counselors in light of the 2005 code changes.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

End-of-Life Decision Making: A Slippery Slope


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?