Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research

By Tremblay, Maxime A.; Blanchard, Céline M. et al. | Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, October 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research


Tremblay, Maxime A., Blanchard, Céline M., Villeneuve, Martin, Taylor, Sara, Pelletier, Luc G., Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science


The Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS) is an 1 8-item measure of work motivation theoretically grounded in self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000). The purpose of the present research was twofold. First, the applicability of the WEIMS in different work environments was evaluated. Second, its factorial structure and psychometric properties were assessed. Two samples of workers (military: N = 465; civilians: N = 192) voluntarily completed questionnaires. Using the WEIMS's 3 indexes (work self-determination index, work self-determined and nonself-determined motivation, respectively), results of regression analyses were supportive of its ability to predict positive and negative criteria in the workplace. Results also showed the adequacy of both its construct validity and internal consistency. Its factorial structure was also invariant across samples. Finally, its quasi-simplex pattern and relationships with psychological correlates further supported the self-determination continuum. Overall, these findings provide evidence for the applicability as well as the reliability and validity of the WEIMS in organisational settings. Results are discussed in regard to the applicability of self-determination theory to the workplace.

Keywords: work motivation, self-determination theory, scale validation

Work motivation is an enigmatic topic in work and organisational science (Kanfer, Chen, & Pritchard, 2008). Given today's economy, a motivated workforce represents botìi a competitive advantage and a critical strategic asset in any work environment. In organisational research, work motivation has been the subject of more theories than any other topic (Baron, 1991); organisational researchers see employee motivation as a fundamental building block in the development of effective theories (Steers, Mowday, & Shapiro, 2004). Indeed, programs of research guided by expectancy-valance theory, self-regulation and goal-setting formulations, social exchange and justice approaches, and selfperspective (e.g., self-determination theory [SDT]; Deci & Ryan, 1985, 2000) have stimulated the development of organisational and managerial practises to promote positive worker attitudes (e.g., employee commitment) and enhance job performance (e.g., individual and team effort).

An issue that warrants attention in motivation research is the method and approach used to assess this construct. Assessments of employee motivation need to be practical, fast, flexible, and accessible through different means. Short, theory-grounded measures leading to concrete applied venues are key to addressing these organisational needs. This paper will thusly define and review different approaches to studying and assessing motivation in the workplace. Emphasis will be given to a subjective approach grounded in SDT, which should prove valuable and practical for use in rapidly changing organisational environments.

Definition and Types of Motivation Measure

Pinder (1998) defined work motivation as "a set of energetic forces that originates both within as well as beyond an individual's being, to initiate work-related behaviour, and to determine its form, direction, intensity and duration" (p. 11). Motivation is thusly manifested by attention, effort, and persistence. The ability to measure factors that energize, channel, and sustain work behaviour over time (Steers et al., 2004), is essential for capturing employee motivation and for developing interventions aimed at enhancing motivation, and in turn, job satisfaction and performance. To date, most research on the influence of individual factors in work motivation has investigated differences that can be captured through self-report measures of personality, affect, interests, and values (Kanfer et al., 2008). Within the organisational psychology literature, there are four major measurement systems used to assess work motivation. These include projective, objective, implicit/explicit, and subjective measures.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?