Investigating the Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to Regional Planning in the United Kingdom

By Shaw, David; Sykes, Olivier | The Town Planning Review, March 2003 | Go to article overview

Investigating the Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to Regional Planning in the United Kingdom


Shaw, David, Sykes, Olivier, The Town Planning Review


This paper considers how the emerging European spatial development policy agenda is influencing the performance of regional strategic planning in the United Kingdom. The European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) was agreed in 1999 as a non-binding and indicative framework intended to guide institutions in the exercise of their spatially significant competences. This paper explores the way in which and the extent to which the spatial planning policy messages and approach of the ESDP have been integrated into the planning process in England and how they have helped to inform the development of substantive objectives for regional planning policy. The research revealed considerable variation in the way that different regions had considered the European agenda and the ESDP as important contexts which can be used to inform strategy and policy development. Overall, the findings suggested that the European context and the ESDP are beginning to be accepted as important frames of reference in the production of Regional Planning Guidance.

The European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) has long been the focus of extensive debate and activity among academics and practitioners both within and outside the Reld of planning. A number of authors have written on the process of preparing the perspective (Giannakourou, 1996; Jorgensen, 1998; Rusca, 1998; Nadin, 2000; Nadin and Shaw, 1999; Davoudi, 1999; Faludi, 2000a; 2000b; 2001; 2003; Faludi, et al. 2000; Williams, 2000; Faludi and Waterhout, 2002), and the way in which the different priorities and interests of the players helped to propel the project forward and give it a particular form and content. In the absence of a formal treaty competence for spatial planning the process was not steered by the Commission and rePected an 'endemic struggle' (Faludi, 2000b, 245) between the member states and the Commission, especially the reluctance of federal nations to cede power to higher levels as rePected by German promotion of the 'counter-current' principle. 'Inevitably, therefore, the high politics of integration forms the shifting context of any attempt at developing supranational spatial policy' (Faludi, 2000b, 246). RePecting this dynamic agenda the whole issue of the place of spatial policy and planning within the European polity has generated debates about competences, regionalism and power shifts between governance levels in Europe. In particular there has been a sustained debate in relation to the competence of the EU in matters of spatial planning (Nadin, 2000b; Eser and Konstadakopulos, 2000) and more recently in relation to the way in which discourses of European spatial planning are de facto already inPuencing the terms of reference for, and the practice of, planning in Europe (Richardson and Jensen, 2001). The present paper relates to such debates and investigates how European spatial planning is in reality inPuencing the 'formal/established' planning system at the regional level within a member state as opposed to informal planning activities designed and funded speciRcally to carry forward the ESDP agenda. Many authors citing Weiler's (1999) threefold typology of European governance (international, supranational and infranational) suggest that the ESDP process, and the role of the informal Committee on Spatial Development (CSD) within it, is a classic example of the 'infranational' approach whereby committees of experts develop policy beyond the established structures of political accountability with low actor visibility (Jensen and Richardson, 2000; Williams, 2000). Jensen and Richardson argue that the process of developing a European spatial planning framework is 'implicitly normative and ideologicalDabout politics and power as much as about rational policy making' (Jensen and Richardson, 2000, 506). RePecting the political nature of the process, the form which the emerging 'perspective' took evolved as the process developed. It was subject to ebbs and Pows as different member states attached different priority to the overall process, and had different priorities and desired outcomes within it (Faludi, 2000a). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Investigating the Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to Regional Planning in the United Kingdom
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.