Putting Parish Plans in Their Place: Relationships between Community-Based Initiatives and Development Planning in English Villages

By Owen, Stephen; Moseley, Malcolm | The Town Planning Review, December 2003 | Go to article overview

Putting Parish Plans in Their Place: Relationships between Community-Based Initiatives and Development Planning in English Villages


Owen, Stephen, Moseley, Malcolm, The Town Planning Review


Two approaches to village planning have evolved over the past 50 years or so-the traditional land use approach of local planning authorities and, recently, more broadly based planning initiatives undertaken by communities themselves. The paper traces the evolution of these two approaches, pointing to the confusion between them that exists already and the potential conflict that might arise over land use and development decisions. Specifically, findings from research into the connections between Parish Plans and the planning system are reported. The current reform of the planning system presents an opportunity to develop a convergent approach to village planning that could reconcile the two different approaches. To this end a procedural framework is proposed that would relate Parish Plans to both Local Development Frameworks and Community Strategies and would encourage the planning system to be more responsive to the needs and aspirations of local communities within the context of wider strategic planning imperatives.

The potential for confusion

For the past 50 years village planning in England has been undertaken rather patchily by local planning authorities. Village plans, where they have been prepared, have been instruments of physical planning restricted essentially to the use and development of land. More recently the 1990s saw the emergence of a large number of community led and more broadly based planning initiatives in villages. These included village appraisals, village design statements, village action plans, parish maps, 'planning for real' exercises and many others. At the turn of the century there were calls for the development of 'holistic' village plans prepared by the local community (TCPA, 1999; LGA, 1999; Countryside Agency, 2000; DETR and MAFF, 2000; Murray and Greer, 2001; Moseley, 2002; Owen, 2002). Alongside the growth of these community led initiatives has been the resurgence of the so-called 'plan led' statutory planning system initiated in the 1991 Planning and Compensation Act and continued in subsequent government policies, most recently in the 2003 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill.1

The publication of the 2000 Rural White Paper Our Countryside: The Future (DETR and MAFF, 2000) and the 2001 Planning Green Paper Planning: Delivering a Fundamental Change (DTLR, 2001) highlighted a tension between two seemingly very different approaches to village planning. First, the 2000 Rural White Paper proposed Parish Plans, which would be prepared by parish councils covering a wide range of issues of concern to the local community well beyond the scope of the planning system but including planning matters. Second, the 2001 Planning Green Paper proposed 'action plans' for villages, which would be prepared by local planning authorities and confined to matters that lie entirely within the remit of the planning system. The tension epitomised by these two proposed instruments is between, on the one hand, the emerging recognition of a need for a community-based approach to village planning encompassing a much wider range of issues than land use and, on the other, established practice whereby local planning authorities themselves prepare proposals for the use and development of land in villages as part of the statutory planning system.

The 2002 Planning Policy Statement Sustainable Communities: Delivering Through Planning (ODPM, 2002a), issued in response to consultation over the 2001 Planning Green Paper and paving the way for the 2003 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill, moderates the initial proposal to introduce action plans. It proposes instead to introduce 'Area Action Plans'. These would be development plan documents, but their focus would 'move from a traditional land use approach to a more spatial approach' (ODPM, 2002b, 3). Additionally, less formal supplementary planning guidance would continue to be a material consideration in deciding planning applications.2 With the further provision that all such documents should show evidence of community involvement, this emerging flexibility could help to reduce, or even resolve, some of the tensions between the two different approaches to village planning, the community led holistic approach and the local planning authority led land use approach, by offering an effective role within the planning system to community initiatives. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Putting Parish Plans in Their Place: Relationships between Community-Based Initiatives and Development Planning in English Villages
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.