If You Misrate, Then You Lose: Improving Credit Rating Accuracy through Incentive Compensation

By Listokin, Yair; Taibleson, Benjamin | Yale Journal on Regulation, Winter 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

If You Misrate, Then You Lose: Improving Credit Rating Accuracy through Incentive Compensation


Listokin, Yair, Taibleson, Benjamin, Yale Journal on Regulation


Credit rating agencies (CRAs) serve many roles in maintaining properly functioning debt markets. Their contribution to both Enron-era financial scandals and the 2008-2010 financial crisis, however, has led to many calls for credit rating reform. This Essay proposes an incentive compensation scheme in which CRAs are paid with the debt they rate. If a CRA overrates debt, then the CRA suffers a financial penalty because the debt the CRA receives as compensation is less valuable than the cash compensation that the debt is replacing. We believe that this reform, though imperfect, would be more likely to generate accurate ratings than other credit rating reform proposals. We also discuss extensions of our basic debt compensation proposal that mitigate some of debt compensation's weaknesses, though at the cost of greater complexity.

I. Introduction

How does one estimate the probability that a loan will go into default? This question is critical in the face of the 2008-2010 financial crisis. The simplest answer may be to "leave it to the market," but there are several obstacles to this approach. To protect against financial instability, governments may provide some sort of guarantee to creditors of financial institutions. To ensure that financial institutions do not exploit this guarantee, regulators may require financial institutions to hold "safe" capital, which in turn requires some estimate of the default probabilities of securities held by financial institutions.1 Default probability estimates are also useful for preventing pension managers and other money managers from taking excessive risks. Finally, many credit securities have relatively illiquid markets, making market-oriented estimates of default probabilities imperfect. This problem grows especially acute in periods of market failure, such as the stoppage of markets for mortgage-backed securities and commercial paper in the fall of 2008.

Credit ratings exist to ameliorate many of these deficiencies. Credit rating agencies (CRAs), such as Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch, are paid by loan issuers to estimate the default probability of loans.2 Issuers pay for ratings, because a host of government regulations require investors to hold ratings above a certain threshold; without a rating, the pool of investors for the loan shrinks. By providing information to suppliers of capital, ratings also help mitigate asymmetric information problems that may undermine market functioning.3 This has created an enormous market for credit ratings. American CRAs rate over $30 trillion of debt,4 and Moody's has had the highest profit margin in the Standard & Poor's 500 for five consecutive years.5

Unfortunately, failures by the three primary bond raters have played a central role in the 2008-2010 financial crisis.6 The agencies gave high ratings to securities through a form of financial alchemy.7 These ratings facilitated the sale of the securities to institutions seeking relatively high yields from securities that met or exceeded their minimum rating qualifications, helping to fuel the housing and credit bubbles by increasing access to credit. Financial companies, the creators of the securities, held mortgages and other assets as inventory to form more securities. When the housing and leveraged buyout bubbles burst, the mortgages underlying the securities began to default, reducing the value of the highly-rated securities and of the inventory held by financial companies. These reductions in value, in turn, reduced the capital cushion of highlyleveraged financial companies, creating the conditions for the financial meltdown.8 Finally, a lack of confidence in the accuracy of ratings contributed to market failures fueled by information asymmetries. Without reliable ratings, complicated securities became untouchable at almost any price.9

Unlike many other organizations implicated in the financial crisis,10 Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch continue to exist and occupy the same role that they did before the crisis.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

If You Misrate, Then You Lose: Improving Credit Rating Accuracy through Incentive Compensation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?