Paradigm Shift in Turkey's Foreign Policy

By Koprulu, Kemal | The Brown Journal of World Affairs, Fall 2009 | Go to article overview

Paradigm Shift in Turkey's Foreign Policy

Koprulu, Kemal, The Brown Journal of World Affairs

The Turkish government has disregarded European values and Western interests in many of its recent foreign policy maneuvers. Often the justification put forth at these junctures is the sensitivities of Turkish society, reflected in opinion polls. The guiding principle of recent years' foreign policy of zero problems with neighbors may in theory sound good but, in practice, this approach has many shortfalls. It does not serve Turkey's overarching aim of European Union integration, nor does it contribute to the spread of democratic values from Turkey to its neighbors. There are indeed many fragile balances in the neighboring regions of Turkey, especially in Eurasia and the Middle East. However, Turkey could both manage its public sensitivities and its pivotal geostrategic position without alienating its allies, raising questions about its motives, confusing its public, and causing long term detriment to the country's strategic interests. Not doing so is either the choice or the mismanagement of the government, and often a mixture of both.

Turkey has enjoyed a decade of legislative reforms driven by the EU integration process that started with the acceptance of Turkey as a candidate country at the EU Helsinki Summit in December 1999. Substantial economic growth for five years following 2002 was made possible due to the post-crisis restructuring of the Turkish economy in 2001. This period coincided with the spreading of the global economic bubble as increasing levels of funds were available for emerging markets. The rights of young people were expanded with the minimum age to run for parliament being lowered from 30 to 25, a new penal code granted women more protection against domestic violence and sexual violation, and Kurds enjoyed official TV broadcasts in Kurdish for the first time. But is this sufficient to conclude that young people, women, and Kurds have advanced opportunities or are more comfortable and free in their daily life? There are serious discrepancies that complicate the picture. Indeed, the glass is half empty.

Because Turkey embodies profound contrasts on many levels and has been changing rapidly, deeply contradictory conclusions are being drawn around the world, and in Turkey itself, about the direction of the country. There is a stark polarization and a general confusion about how to read Turkey's transformation. The objective data taken into account, such as economic figures, legislative reforms, or opinion polls might be the same, but due to the diversity of the country, social, cultural, and political trends taken as fundamental and determinant may differ. Moreover, material can be found to back up opposing judgements.

Since 2005, worrisome trends have been taking place in Turkey, which have often escaped the radar screen of the West. However because of its recent unpredictable moves in foreign policy, more questions have been raised in the international arena about Turkey's direction. To understand the paradigm shift in Turkey's foreign policy, it is imperative to factor in the style of management of the political leadership and understand how this leadership manner affects public opinion.

Culture and PoliticCs - Tthe rise of misrust and pPolarization

In recent years, a number of research polls have been conducted in Turkey to measure cultural/social trends and perceptions. The majority of these polls have shown Turkish society to be highly divided, intolerant, and emotionally reactive. Trust of others is low, leading from heightened vulnerability to conspiracy theories and manipulation by religious and political currents, particularly among the young generation. Social trends of such nature render it unlikely that Turkey can sustain the international roles and responsibilities it has taken upon itself. A highly emotional and polarized society also offers a much more challenging setting in which to solve serious domestic problems, such as the Kurdish problem.

Yilmaz Esmer, a reputable professor at Bahcesehir University, conducted a nationwide survey in Turkey throughout April and May 2009, gauging social perception trends on issues ranging from tolerance, threats, and feelings about foreign countries to current affairs, religosity, trust, and happiness. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Paradigm Shift in Turkey's Foreign Policy


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.