The Experiential Learning Model for Delivering Agricultural Education, with a New Perspective on the Role of Communities

By Croom, Barry | The Agricultural Education Magazine, January/February 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Experiential Learning Model for Delivering Agricultural Education, with a New Perspective on the Role of Communities

Croom, Barry, The Agricultural Education Magazine

Those of us who work in teacher education occasionally amuse ourselves by coming up with new ways to explain what agriculture teachers do naturally in their classes each day without much forethought. One of our favorite models in agricultural education, and the one we use to explain and justify almost everything we do in agricultural education, is the integrated three-circle model portrayed in figure 1 . This model has explained for almost 35 years the interrelationships between three major concepts: classroom and laboratory instruction, supervised agricultural experience, and the FFA agricultural youth organization participation. Classroom and laboratory instruction are those activities that provide learning experiences within the confines of a school facility. These classroom activities are characterized by learning activities designed by an agriculture teacher and presented to students using formal instruction methods such as lecture, demonstration, guided and independent practice, review and assessment.

Supervised Agricultural Experience (SAE) is an independent learning program for students enrolled in agricultural education courses, and is designed to provide learning experiences for students in the agricultural career pathway of their choice. Supervised agricultural experience requires an educational plan cooperatively developed by the student, the agriculture teacher, the student's parents, and an employer if necessary.

The FFA is an instructional tool that compliments both instruction and supervised agricultural experience. FFA activities include career development events, individual member awards programs, scholarships and leadership programs.

Until recently, I have been completely in agreement with the threecircle model. Now I realize that it has a few problems. First, the visual representation of the model always has a minimal overlap between the three components. That means a large portion of the FFA is not instruction, a large portion of SAE is not instruction, and two thirds of what we do in agricultural education is not instruction.

The integrated agricultural education model is supposed to combine instruction, supervised agricultural experience and FFA (Talbert, Vaughn & Croom, 2006). However, a number of studies have indicated a decline in the number of students involved in supervised experience. Dyer and Osborne (1996) and Cheek, Arrington, Carter and Randell (1994) conclude that SAE programs lack overall direction and goals by which program quality can be measured. A number of studies (Dyer & Osborne, 1995: Dyer & Williams, 1997; Steele, 1997) conclude that many teachers fail to fully implement SAE in the agricultural education program, even though SAE has a proven economic impact (Retallick & Martin, 2005).

With regard to the FFA element of the model, there is a gap between the number of agricultural education students and the number of students who are official members of the FFA even though FFA membership has continued to increase in recent years (National FFA Organization, 2006). Even though students who join the FFA were more connected to the industry of agriculture and were more engaged in agricultural education coursework (Talbert & Balschweid, 2004; Croom & Flowers, 2001), the National FFA Organization (2006) reported a gap of almost 200,000 students between FFA membership and student enrollment in agricultural education programs.

Of the components in the threecomponent model of agricultural education, instruction occurs with the greatest frequency. If this model is composed in such a way that classroom instruction, FFA and SAE are integrally linked and equally weighted components, then why do the FFA and SAE components generally subordinate themselves to instruction?

Finally, the three-circle model ignores a major component of every agricultural education program - the community it which it resides. The community provides the support and direction for schools, and each school is a distinct mirror image of the community in which it resides.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Experiential Learning Model for Delivering Agricultural Education, with a New Perspective on the Role of Communities


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?