The Conman and the Sheriff: SEC Jurisdiction and the Role of Offshore Financial Centers in Modern Securities Fraud*

By Dhesi, Nick S. | Texas Law Review, May 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Conman and the Sheriff: SEC Jurisdiction and the Role of Offshore Financial Centers in Modern Securities Fraud*


Dhesi, Nick S., Texas Law Review


Congress founded the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 1934 in the wake of the greatest financial collapse in history. More than seventy years later, the SEC, charged by Congress with a mandate to preserve the national public interest through fair and honest markets, remains a critical force in policing U.S. markets. But while the scope and authority of the SEC's power has expanded over time, so too have the crimes it seeks to prevent. Over the last five years, a carousel of large, international frauds by well-known and well-regarded financiers undermined the integrity of global securities markets and international cooperation in market enforcement. Specifically, these crimes, perpetrated by rogue financiers like Bernard Madoff and Sir Allen Stanford, have cost investors in the Americas and beyond billions of dollars. In light of these inventive frauds, no simple solution can prevent all forms of financial crime; however, this Note advocates an expansion of SEC authority to place a substantial hurdle in the way of these clandestine conmen in the hopes of stripping them of a primary tool-the use of offshore financial centers (OFCs).

To prevent conmen from avoiding SEC jurisdiction and capitalizing on self-interested local regulation in OFCs, this Note encourages Congress to grant the SEC the authority to initiate investigations on foreign soil-with prior consent from foreign regulators-when it perceives a substantial threat to investors in the United States. To support such an expansion of authority, this Note first provides a primer on OFCs and their use by international fraudsters, drawing from three recent case studies of securities fraud. Then, this Note will explain the expansion of SEC authority while addressing both the inefficiencies in the SEC's current cooperative model and the precedent for such an expansion of authority-Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act. Finally, this Note will apply the SEC's expanded jurisdiction to the three case studies discussed earlier to demonstrate how this new approach can prevent the types of frauds that threaten the integrity of U.S. markets and the national public interest.

I. Enhancing SEC Jurisdiction to Combat International Fraud - An Introduction

In light of persistent technological innovation and the integration of global markets, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must adapt constantly to new challenges threatening its domain.1 As the recent financial crisis again demonstrates, the effects of adverse market conditions in one nation can cause unforeseeable damage across the world.2 Moreover, given the speed of modern transactions, where money deposited in Omaha before breakfast can be in London for tea and in Hong Kong by dinner, regulators often have trouble keeping pace with increasingly complex, rapid communications.3 Amidst this changing economic and regulatory landscape, a new villain has emerged to challenge the SEC: the international fraudster or conman.4 Recently, these conmen, like Sir Allen Stanford and Bernard Madoff, have dominated the press with the exploits of their multi-billiondollar frauds.5 To impede the proliferation of international conmen, this Note will investigate the role that offshore financial centers (OFCs) play in modern cons and offer a possible mechanism by which the SEC may be able to mitigate the damage done by fraudsters.

Specifically, the manner in which conmen utilize OFCs in their frauds often raises red flags that something is amiss, giving regulators an opportunity to stop a fraud before it escalates.6 However, despite the prevalence of these indicators, the SEC cannot act peremptorily to halt a growing fraud because it is unable to rely on foreign regulators in these OFCs,7 and it lacks the authority to initiate unilateral investigations within foreign borders.8 As a result, conmen engage in OFC-based activity to avoid SEC jurisdiction and capitalize on self-interested local regulation,9 placing substantial hurdles in the way of the SECs enforcement efforts.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Conman and the Sheriff: SEC Jurisdiction and the Role of Offshore Financial Centers in Modern Securities Fraud*
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?