Governmental Accounting, Global Markets and Ideologies: A Historical Study of State and Local Practices in the United States

By Sacco, John F.; Stalebrink, Odd J. | Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Spring 2010 | Go to article overview

Governmental Accounting, Global Markets and Ideologies: A Historical Study of State and Local Practices in the United States


Sacco, John F., Stalebrink, Odd J., Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management


ABSTRACT. This paper examines the interaction between changes in governmental accounting, ideology and global capital markets. Based on a historical analysis from the late 1800s to the turn of the 21st century it provides support for the general hypothesis that the strength and support of global capital markets and pro-market ideologies is positively related to the likelihood of the adoption by governments of accounting methods geared toward exposing full costs and total debt. The analysis also illustrates that governments are more likely to use accounting methods that allow for greater flexibility for spending, borrowing and off balance sheet financing during times when global capital markets and pro-market ideologies are in decline.

INTRODUCTION

To date, changes in government accounting have often been attributed to increments - and sometimes - to quantum leaps (Coombs & Edwards, 2004) caused by advances in technology. This paper explores the role of two alternative explanatory factors - the role of political ideology and global capital markets as causes of changes in governmental accounting. Specifically, based on an historical analysis of changes in governmental accounting practices from the late 1800s to the turn of the 21st century, the research provides support for the general hypothesis that the strength and support of global capital markets and pro-market ideologies are positively related to the likelihood of governments adopting accounting methods that are geared toward exposing full costs and total debt. The analysis also illustrates that governments are more likely to use accounting methods that allow for greater flexibility for spending, borrowing and off balance sheet financing during times when global capital markets and pro-market ideologies are in decline.

The paper is limited to the exploration of the role of two ideologies as they relate to changes in state and local governmental accounting practices in the United States. One of the ideologies is in support of markets and one in support of the administrative state. For markets, neo-liberalism is the ideology. Neo-liberalism is an extension of classical liberalism. It is an ideology that views private property as an essential component of civil society. Government is viewed as an infringement on liberty. Underlying neo-liberalism is the assumption that individuals have a much better idea of what is good for them than the government has.

For the administrative state, progressivism is the ideology. Progressivism places substantial faith in governments' ability to make sound economic and social decisions (in the sense of improving economic progress and protecting people from evils such as poverty). It views public decisions as guided by professionalism and science. Socialism was never a serious path in the U.S. and is therefore deemphasized in this study.

BACKGROUND

Notwithstanding periodic battles over the methods of public sector accounting and financial reporting, research on these upheavals has received limited attention. Christensen (2002, p. 95), in reference to the period 1980 to 2000, writes: "The dramatic emergence of public sector accounting from a prolonged period of ossification represents a juncture in accounting history that demands some analysis."

Other such junctions exist, and, in a fashion, relate to the agenda of this paper. For example, Edwards, Coombs and Greener (2002) make reference to public sector accounting as part of an investigation of governmental accounting controversies that arose in 1828 in Great Britain. According to the authors, "[T]he initiative [accrual and double entry accounting] was resisted [by the government] and we draw on the concepts of ideological conflicts...to help comprehend the reasons...." (p. 637). As for the role of capital markets, Edwards Coombs and Greener (2002) looked to the industrial revolution as a force that set up this ideological battle.

A rather comprehensive historical study resides with Goddard (2002) who covers Great Britain for three periods, including (1) 1830- 1880, which is a period of laissez faire (capital markets emerged earlier in GB); (2) 1880-1970, the period of corporatist hegemony (the state, or as termed in this paper, the administrative state, as the dominant mediator) and; (3) post 1970 as the neo-liberal period (the return of capital markets and neo-liberalism in this project).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Governmental Accounting, Global Markets and Ideologies: A Historical Study of State and Local Practices in the United States
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.