THE PUBLIC NUISANCE PARADIGM: CHANGES IN MASS MEDIA COVERAGE OF POLITICAL PROTEST SINCE THE 1960s

By Di Cicco, Damon T. | Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Spring 2010 | Go to article overview

THE PUBLIC NUISANCE PARADIGM: CHANGES IN MASS MEDIA COVERAGE OF POLITICAL PROTEST SINCE THE 1960s


Di Cicco, Damon T., Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly


This study examined coverage of protests in five major newspapers in the United States between 1967 and 2007, and found that during that time period, protests were depicted as a nuisance. Such depictions are attributed to the rise of a "public nuisance" paradigm in coverage of protests, theorized to be linked to an increased conservatism in America, and driven by the notion that protests are a bothersome interruption of everyday activities, as well as ineffective and unpatriotic. Discussion of protests as nuisances increased substantially across time, and ideologically liberal protests were treated as nuisances more often than were conservative ones.

Social and political protests are an important part of American political culture and have helped shape the course of U.S. history.1 Further, in a political landscape in which large sums of money are increasingly required to compete in the electoral system,2 protests remain a democratic form of political engagement, requiring little more than a large number of likeminded people. Nonetheless, contemporary news coverage often seems to suggest that protests are an irrelevant nuisance. For example, a 1994 article in the New York Times compared the activities of anti-abortion protesters in New York City to "traffic jams along north Broadway," and quoted the police chief as saying he had "grown weary" of the "humming and praying and otherwise carrying on" of protesters. Such coverage raises questions about the conditions under which protests are marginalized or dismissed, and the frequency with which this occurs. With this in mind, this research seeks to identify and explain changes in protest coverage that have occurred over the last four decades.

News and Protests

Communication scholars have shown that protests tend to be covered in a formulaic and derisive way, employing a news routine that Chan and Lee, building upon the foundational study of protest coverage by Gitlin, coined the "protest paradigm."3 Gitlin analyzed 1960s news coverage of Students for a Democratic Society, arguing that journalistic depictions of protests often left them "deformed beyond recognition" and represented as "a mixture of absurdity and menace" via a number of disparaging framing devices.4 Such devices in the years since have been found in coverage of protests across the ideological spectrum.5

"Protest paradigm" news coverage contains consistent patterns, beginning with criticism of protesters and protest groups - such as an emphasis on protesters' unusual appearances and demonstration strategies and highlighting the presence of any so-called "extremists" present among them. Such coverage creates an image of demonstrators as fringe radicals.6 The protest paradigm also disparages specific protests by suggesting disunity among participants and using quotation marks for nonspeech items (e.g., "animal rights") to express journalistic skepticism.7 Another element of the protest paradigm is an emphasis on dramatic events and images such as violent conflict between protesters and police and other counter-normative actions.8 Further, public opinion is often invoked in coverage to marginalize protesters and protest goals.9 Finally, protest paradigm coverage tends to favor the perspectives of authorities over those of protesters,10 sometimes excluding protesters' voices entirely.11

Relatively unexplored, however, is news coverage of the idea of protest itself. This research introduces the idea of the "public nuisance paradigm" of protest coverage, positing that in recent decades news has increasingly dismissed protests in general - as an irritation, a hindrance, something that interferes with daily life. Such coverage emphasizes the annoyances and inconveniences perceived to be caused by protests, as well as a supposed lack of patriotism and efficacy inherent in this strategy of political engagement. This coverage shares some conceptual overlap with the "protest paradigm," but nuisance paradigm coverage dismisses the method of protests by suggesting that protests cause more trouble than they are worth. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

THE PUBLIC NUISANCE PARADIGM: CHANGES IN MASS MEDIA COVERAGE OF POLITICAL PROTEST SINCE THE 1960s
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.