Measure of R&d Success and Market Value of Firms in the U.S. Pharmaceutical and Semiconductor Industries

By Lee, Sangjoon; Lee, Seong-Hoon | Journal of International Business Research, July 1, 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Measure of R&d Success and Market Value of Firms in the U.S. Pharmaceutical and Semiconductor Industries

Lee, Sangjoon, Lee, Seong-Hoon, Journal of International Business Research


We examine the relationship between the knowledge capital and the stock market value of innovating firms in the pharmaceutical and semiconductor industries in the United States. We use unique patent-firms matched data in the two industries and estimate Tobin' s q equation on the R&D intensity, patent yield of firms, and citations to patents. We find the duration of patent citations received explains the variance of a firm's market value better than the conventional variable of knowledge capital stock. This relationship becomes stronger when the number of citations received 4 or more years after a patent is granted is used as a proxy for the knowledge stock. Use of number of citations received in long-term fixes heterogeneity problem of patent values, thus enables us to better study how firms organize their intangible assets, in particular knowledge stock, and how these are reflected in their future cashflows.

(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)


The output of the R&D investment activity conducted by innovating private firms is an intangible asset to the firm, thus, the size and quality of this intangible asset should be reflected in the market value of the firm. Many studies use patent counts as a proxy for R&D success and estimate the market value of firm.

Since the study of patents (Scherer, 1 965), patent statistics have been widely used to answer questions about sources of economic growth, technological change, and innovation activities. Economists (Schmookler, 1966; Griliches, 1984) use patent counts as indicators of innovation output. However, major problems exist in using patents as output indicators. That is, i) not all inventions are patentable, ii) not all inventions are patented, and iii) inventions that are patented differ in quality. The first two problems can be taken care of by industry dummies, or by limiting the analysis to a particular sector or industry (Griliches, 1990). One study (Pakes and Schankerman, 1986) provides an evidence of the third problem using patent renewal data.

One of remedies on the third problem of patent quality issue is using citation-weighted patent counts (Trajtenberg, 1990; Lanjouw and Shankerman, 1999; Jaffe, 1993). Patent citations trace linkages between inventions, inventors, scientists, firms, etc. Hence, citation weighted patent counts allow us to create indicators of the importance of individual patents, thus able to capture the heterogeneity in the value of patents. A recent study (Hall, Jaffe, and Trajtenberg, 2005) utilizes information on the number of subsequent citations received by a firm's patents to cure this problem. They find the market value of a firm has higher correlation with patent citation counts than patent counts themselves using Tobin's Q for the firms.

However, patent and patent citation data may contain bias from firm's propensity to patent due from speed of technological change, size of market, degree of R&D competition, and importance of patent protection against imitation across technology, sectors, and industries. Patent citation counts come from two sources. The first source is the importance of underlying innovation of a patent. The second comes from firm's patenting activities and propensity to patent. A patent may receive greater number of citations where firms in the industry are involved in more active patenting activities, for example, although the value of underlying innovation of the patent is not significant. In a shorter term two effects are mixed so we cannot distinguish the sources. In a longer term the important patents will be continuously cited while the second source diminishes. Thus patent citations in a longer term better measure the ex-post value of patent than total number of citations.

In this paper, we test whether information of patent citations received long after a patent is granted is a better measure of firm's R&D success and market value of the firm.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Measure of R&d Success and Market Value of Firms in the U.S. Pharmaceutical and Semiconductor Industries


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?