Aspects of Complexity Theory in Liberal Political Thought

By Bittick, R. M. | Emergence: Complexity and Organization, January 1, 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Aspects of Complexity Theory in Liberal Political Thought


Bittick, R. M., Emergence: Complexity and Organization


Complexity theory is founded on post-positivist thinking. However, aspects of complexity theory are found in the writings of Liberal political philosophers such as John Locke and Immanuel Kant. This paper focuses on one aspect of Liberal political philosophy: how liberal social-political orders emerge from the interactions of individuals. The author argues that while complexity theory and Liberal political philosophy are compatible concerning emergent orders, they differ on scientific method and foundational norms. This is this important because Liberal political philosophy is a significant part of the foundation of the United States political order and impacts how public administrators implement public policies.

Introduction

Complexity theory is founded on postpositivist thinking. However, aspects of complexity theory can be found in the writings of early Liberal political philosophers such as John Locke and Immanuel Kant. This paper focuses on one such aspect of Liberal political philosophy: how liberal social-political polities emerge from the interactions of individuals. As such, this paper identifies compatible aspects of complexity theory that overlap with aspects of Liberal political philosophy. Focusing on the writings of Locke and Kant, the paper argues that while these philosophers wrote in the Newtonian tradition, certain aspects of their thinking are compatible with complexity theory.

This is important because Liberal political philosophy is a significant part of the foundation of the United States political order and impacts how public administrators implement public policies. Furthermore, an important element of Liberal political philosophy is rational thinking because it was originally rooted in the Newtonian/Empirical approach to science. However, complexity theory shows that much of existence cannot be understood through a linear, deterministic approach to science. This raises a related question: Is complexity theory compatible with Liberal political philosophy? This paper argues that while they are compatible concerning the idea of emerging political orders, they differ on scientific method and on foundational norms.

The approach taken in this paper is theoretical and exploratory. The following sections begin by exploring complexity theory, then examining Liberal political philosophy according to Locke and Kant, and then compare these to each other. Finally, implications for public administrators are examined.

What is Complexity Theory?

Complexity theory is a recent approach to research stemming from the biological and physical sciences. Some describe it as a postmodern approach to science (Cilliers, 2000; Abraham, 2001), while others argue that while it has similarities with postmodern thinking, it is best described as a post-positivist approach rooted in science (Price, 1997; Byrne, 1998; Morcol, 2001; Phelan, 2001). I take the latter approach to complexity in this study.

Kurt Richardson and Paul Cilliers (2001) note that there is not a firm definition of complexity theory (p. 8). However, they argue that there are three themes in complexity theory:

1. "Reductionistic Complexity Science" which strives for a "theory of everything" that explains the existence of everything (p. 5-6);

2. "Soft Complexity Science" focusing on language and meaning in the social world, which makes it distinct from the natural world (p. 6-7); and,

3. "Complexity Thinking," focusing on the limits of human knowledge, especially in social systems (pp. 7-8).

Neil E. Harrison (2006) defines a system as, "a portion of the universe within a defined boundary, outside of which lies an environment" (p. 2). He notes that some systems are simple, while others are complex. What makes a system complex is "diversity and decentralization" (p. 3).

In this paper, "complexity theory" concerns the study of complex adaptive systems, or CAS. John H. Holland (1995) describes a complex adaptive system as "systems composed of interacting agents described in terms of rules" (p.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Aspects of Complexity Theory in Liberal Political Thought
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?