The Too Friendly Judge? Social Networks and the Bench

By Gray, Cynthia | Judicature, May/June 2010 | Go to article overview

The Too Friendly Judge? Social Networks and the Bench


Gray, Cynthia, Judicature


Judicial ethics advisory opinions seldom "go viral," but a November 9, 2009 opinion about judges and social networking by the Floridajudicial Ethics Advisory Committee became the subject of numerous newspaper stories worldwide. The opinion advised judges not to add lawyers who may appear before them as "friends" or permit those lawyers to add them as their "friends," although it did not prohibit judges from being on social networks altogether or from "friending" lawyers and others who did not appear before them.1

The Florida Committee noted its concern that "listing lawyers who may appear before the judge as 'friends' on a judge's social networking page reasonably conveys to others the impression that these lawyer 'friends' are in a special position to influence the judge."

This is not lo say, of course, that simply because a lawyer is listed as a "friend" on a social networking site or because a lawyer is a friend of the judge, as the tenu friend is used in its traditional sense, means thai this lawyer is, in faci, in a special position to influence the judge. The issue, however, is not whether the lawyer actually is in a position to influence die judge, bul instead whether the proposed conduct, the identification of the lawyer as a "friend" on die social networking site, conveys the impression that the lawyer Ls in a posidon to influence the judge.

The Committee concluded that the identification in a public forum of a lawyer who may appear before the judge does convey the impression of influence and therefore is not permitted.

The opinion apparently got some push-back from dismayed Florida judges, several of whom proposed ways to get around the problems perceived by the Committee. (According to the Orlando Sentinel, many judges defriended lawyers, and a few stopped using Facebook and similar sites altogetiier after the opinion was issued.) One judge suggested to the committee drat the appearance problem could be solved if she placed a prominent disclaimer on her profile page stating the term "friend" should be interpreted to mean that the person is only an acquaintance of the judge, not a "friend" in the traditional sense. A second judge proposed adopting a policy of accepting all lawyers who request as "friends" and communicating that "the term 'friend' is, in the judge's opinion, a misnomer."

Although it "thoroughly and thoughtfully reconsidered" the issue, the Florida Committee rejected those suggestions and reaffirmed the original opinion.2 All Committee members agreed that "placing a disclaimer on the judge's social networking site uniquely defining the term 'friend'" for the judge's pages would not effectively dispel any otherwise impermissible message. The Committee also rejected the concept that "a judge can engage in unethical conduct so long as the judge announces at the time that the judge perceives the conduct to be ethical." The Committee did state that ajudge who is a member of a voluntary bar association is not required to "de-friend" lawyers who are also members on that organization's Facebook page and who use Facebook to communicate about the organization and other non-legal matters.3

Three members of the Florida Committee, however, filed a minority opinion on the issue whetherjudges may add lawyers who appear before them as their friends, arguing that the term "friend" on an internet social networking site does not mean a friend in the traditional sense and that even a traditional friendship without more is permissible. The minority contended:

The logical extension of the majority's opinion is that judges cannot be friends with any lawyer who appears before the judge since there is no discernable difference between a judge's friendship with an attorney on a social networking site and a judge having lunch with an attorney, playing tennis with an attorney, or engaging in a myriad of other activities with attorneys who appear before the judge. . . . The exclusivity and selectivity by the judge in choosing to spend time and enjoyment with some attorneys and not others is far more apparent than "friendship" Ln the social networking setting of the internet.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Too Friendly Judge? Social Networks and the Bench
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.