Systems Integration through Concurrent Learning

By Cavaleri, Steven A.; Fearon, David S. | Industrial Management, July/August 1994 | Go to article overview

Systems Integration through Concurrent Learning


Cavaleri, Steven A., Fearon, David S., Industrial Management


Systems integration efforts seek to synchronize many of the diverse work processes that share a natural relationship to a common goal. Systems integration initiatives tend to fall into four general categories:

* Information management; * Modeling and simulation; * Process control and engineering; and * Computer integrated manufacturing (CIM).

Concurrent engineering and business process reengineering have also emerged as useful methods for restructuring and controlling work processes. At the same time, human processes have been acknowledged as being critical in these approaches. But they have always been defined as being supportive rather than instrumental to the effectiveness of these techniques. Human processes can also be reengineered and are critical to systems integration efforts.

LEARNING, INNOVATION AND INTEGRATION

Systems integration focuses on improving relationships. Sometimes the way diverse parts of an organization should fit together are relatively apparent, as in the case of the need to integrate engineering, finance, manufacturing and marketing into new product development activities. In other situations, such as those that Bontadelli and Kirby refer to as "soft systems," the task of defining relationships can be considerably more complex. As they note, human elements play a larger role in soft systems and there is a eater emphasis on learning and improvement. One means of visualizing such relationships is what Senge terms "systems thinking." He describes systems thinking as "a discipline for seeing wholes. It is a framework for seeing interrelationships rather than things, for seeing patterns of change, rather than static 'snapshots.'" Systems thinking is a learning process in which organization members continuously seek to refine their understanding of how things work to become more systemic. Such ways of thinking naturally support innovation and systems integration efforts.

Systems thinking is based on the concept known as "generative learning." Generative learning is learning to lean, as opposed to learning to do. It is based on the same logic that might be used by a weight lifter. The more you strengthen your body, by lifting weights, the more weight you will be able to lift. By contrast, the body builder lifts weights solely to look better, not to lift heavier weights. Through generative learning managers become enabled to learn more and learn faster. Typically, the more someone understands about something the greater the opportunities for visualizing breakthrough innovations. In the case of systems integration, the more systemic one's thinking becomes, the greater their ability to visualize new relationships.

LEARNING AND DOING

Training has often been regarded as the organizational process of learning to do. However, since most training focuses on the transfer of information from an expert source to a training participant, the absence of action or experience from this process makes it more like learning to acquire information. The "learning to do" that is often associated with the development of "know how" usually comes when new information is combined with action, experimentation and experience. For example, a baseball player who wants to know how to hit a curve ball can read about how Ted Williams did it, or they can actually step up to the plate and swat at a few pitches. Learning that comes via experience is both personalized and specific to the situation. It is a process of personal mastery of a situation. Here, learning becomes learning to know how to do. It represents the blending of information and experience into a customized way of doing things that suits both the performer and the situation. For example, a manager can learn to think about business process reengineering by using feedback loop diagrams to design a causal loop model of the process that integrates the various business functions together. Learning to learn and learning to know how to do have usually been regarded as both being important, but separate activities.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Systems Integration through Concurrent Learning
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.