The Waiver and Withdrawal of Death Penalty Appeals as "Extreme Communicative Acts"

By Brisman, Avi | Western Criminology Review, July 2010 | Go to article overview

The Waiver and Withdrawal of Death Penalty Appeals as "Extreme Communicative Acts"


Brisman, Avi, Western Criminology Review


Abstract: Since Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)-the Supreme Court case that permitted the resumption of capital punishment in the United States-1203 executions have been carried out. One hundred and thirty-four (134) executions have involved "volunteers" of all races-individuals who waive or withdraw appeals at a point when viable claims still exist in their cases. This paper explores the power struggle between the State and the condemned over the timing and conditions under which an inmate is executed. It begins with a discussion of current public opinion about the death penalty and the ways in which the death penalty has been resisted. Next, it describes capital defendants who elect execution over life imprisonment and considers some of the reasons proffered for waiver and withdrawal. This paper then contemplates whether some instances of "volunteering" should be regarded as "extreme communicative acts" (Wee 2004, 2007)-non-linguistic communicative acts that are usually associated with protest, especially in the context of a lengthy political struggle (such as hunger strikes, self-immolation, and the chopping off of one's fingers). In so doing, this paper weighs in on the larger questions of who ultimately controls the body of the condemned and what governmental opposition to waiver and withdrawal may reveal about the motives and rationale for the death penalty. This paper also furthers research on how the prison industrial complex is resisted and how State power more generally is negotiated.

Keywords: death penalty/death row; hunger strike; power; protest; resistance; self-immolation; volunteer; waiver; withdrawal

INTRODUCTION

According to the 2008 year-end report by the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC), a research and anti-death-penalty advocacy group, use of capital punishment in the United States has continued to wane (Death Penalty Information Center 2008; see also Moore 2008). State and federal courts executed thirty-seven inmates in 2008-a fourteen-year low. The thirty-seven executions also represent a continued downward trend from a peak of ninety-eight in 1999. In addition, state and federal courts sentenced 111 criminal defendants to death in 2008, the lowest number of per annum condemnations in three decades. Most significantly, the lull in executions defied expectations that more inmates would be put to death after the U.S. Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. Rees, which upheld Kentucky's method of lethal injection and ended a de facto eight-month moratorium (from September 2007-April 2008). Instead, twenty-five executions were stayed in the aftermath of Baze v. Rees, as courts wrestled with issues involving mental illness, actual innocence, and ineffective assistance of counsel. The case of Troy A. Davis, in particular, has attracted international attention because seven of the nine witnesses against the Georgia inmate have recanted their testimony (Brown 2008a).

This is not to suggest that the country as a whole is uniformly moving in the direction of abolition. A Gallup poll conducted in October 2008 revealed that a majority of the public still supports the death penalty, although the numbers are down-64 percent of those surveyed indicated that they were in favor of the death penalty for a person convicted of murder in comparison to 69 percent in 2007 (Saad 2008). In the aftermath of a Georgia jury's failure to agree on the death sentence for Brian G. Nichols, who killed four people in an Atlanta courthouse escape in 2005, Georgia legislators have begun lining up to introduce bills that would end the requirement of a unanimous jury verdict for a death sentence (Brown 2008b). In December 2008, a New Hampshire jury issued the state's first death sentence in almost fifty years (Zezima 2008). And in 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to expand the death penalty to non-homicide offenses, striking down Louisiana's death penalty for the rape of a child in Kennedy v. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Waiver and Withdrawal of Death Penalty Appeals as "Extreme Communicative Acts"
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.