State Capital Improvement Programs and Institutional Arrangements for Capital Budgeting: The Case of Illinois

By Srithongrung, Arwiphawee | Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

State Capital Improvement Programs and Institutional Arrangements for Capital Budgeting: The Case of Illinois


Srithongrung, Arwiphawee, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management


ABSTRACT. This study describes the Illinois State capital budget process and explains why traditional capital planning has not been adopted in Illinois. The state uses non-accounting techniques and multi-attribute judgment criteria, including political and social values, to make decisions. The case suggests that regardless of their sophistication, accounting methods are, relatively, not useful in ranking capital projects across functions. The methods compare "apples" and "oranges." A comparison of capital projects across functions may be impossible with any set of methods. Intelligent sub-optimization within given functions may be the best academics and practitioners can hope for in rationalizing project choice and maintenance, particularly in large cities or state governments. Public capital-budgeting educators might shift their focus in training prospective public budgeters, from accounting methods to critical thinking, through multi-attribute analysis methods.

INTRODUCTION

Capital budgeting varies from state to state (Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations-ACIR, 1987, Hillhouse & Howard, 1963) due to two institutional characteristics: statutory requirements (e.g., debt restriction rules, budget processes, and bond acts) and local management practices (Vogt, 2004). In order to complement the existing literature on practical capital budgets, this study describes the capital budget process in a single state, Illinois. The Illinois capital budget process was chosen as a unit of analysis because of its institutional uniqueness and convenience of data collection. The Illinois State government is described by Freedman (1994) and Peirce and Hagstrom (1984) as being the "most political machine state" relative to its neighboring Great Lakes states.1 In Illinois, public policy decisions, including fiscal policies (taxes and expenditures), are strongly influenced by the value of jobs in a public personnel system that includes patronage (Freedman, 1994). On the expenditure side, collusion between the two parties, known as the Illinois State government's legacy (Anton, 1966), has long been practiced in order to arrive at a compromise among the various interests of different groups (Anton 1966; Freedman, 1994; Peirce & Hagstrom, 1984).2 In this context, it is of interest to describe the Illinois capital budgeting process in practice.

Data were collected from in-depth interviews conducted during the spring and summer of 2006. A case analysis method was used to describe the capital spending process found at the agency and state levels. The interviewing notes and comments were reviewed and analyzed. The following section presents the study propositions. Section three describes the research design and section four presents the study results. The last two sections discuss the results and offer conclusions.

THE CASE PROPOSITIONS

A set of institutional theories was used to understand the practical budgeting processes. Institutional arrangements influence the decision-making process which yields collective choice for policy options (Gordon, 1976). According to this model, an institutional arrangement is a result of the interactions between internal and external environments.3 In the capital budgeting context, these environments can be classified into five aspects. First, a state's capital budgeting practices are defined by the state's constitution and political environment, which designates legislative procedures, power distribution, and policy crafting direction (Rubin, 1988). If the state budgeting process is highly fragmented due to an intensive check and balance system, coupled with a bottom-up policy crafting direction, the capital budgeting process tends to be relatively less focused on centralized infrastructure policy (Rubin, 2006). That is, the department heads are relatively independent in setting capital spending agendas by receiving minimum instructions and requirements from to the central budget office.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

State Capital Improvement Programs and Institutional Arrangements for Capital Budgeting: The Case of Illinois
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?