The Marginalization of Political Philosophy and Its Effects on the Rest of the Discipline

By Kasza, Gregory J. | Political Research Quarterly, September 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Marginalization of Political Philosophy and Its Effects on the Rest of the Discipline


Kasza, Gregory J., Political Research Quarterly


Abstract

Political philosophy has a unique role to play in political science. It focuses attention on the big ontological, epistemological, and normative questions that constitute the foundation of the scholarly enterprise. Due to the reification of subfield boundaries, the assault from hard science, the inward-looking perspective of many political philosophers, and political wrangles within political philosophy, it has ceased to play its distinctive role very well in recent years. As illustrated by the recent debate over methodology, the result is that the rest of the discipline has lost political philosophy's vital contribution to our common intellectual life.

Keywords

graduate education, philosophy of science, professionalization, methodology, positivism, academic politics

As a scholar of comparative politics, I am flattered by Timothy Kaufman-Osborn's invitation to participate in this symposium. The fate of political philosophy as a subfield does not affect my career directly, nor can I comment on the ways in which the subfield's evolving identity may have shaped or distorted the research of its members. I contemplate its waning importance in political science as a concerned neighbor, however, and I am troubled by the impact of the subfield's decline on the rest of the discipline.

Without giving the matter the attention it deserves, I will state my own understanding of political philosophy (old-fashioned, no doubt, compared to the understandings of the other contributors) so as to render what follows comprehensible. Political philosophy is an enterprise characterized by the questions it asks, which are the big questions concerning the nature of politics, knowledge, and morality. What is the character of the human being and human society? What is politics and what should be the proper scope and objectives of political research? What sort of knowledge about politics is possible? What is science? What is a good society? Most adherents of the many schools of thought that Kaufman-Osborn (this issue) lists in his essay are asking these big questions in one form or another. I read or reread works of political philosophy most often when I sense that my research has become focused on minutiae and requires refocusing on issues that truly matter.

Political philosophy should not be equated with a canon of great works, since that would identify it with a finite set of answers rather than a set of questions. But the scholars exploring the big questions did not become an identifiable or self-conscious group only in response to the onslaught of modern science. They may have acquired a novel institutional identity in recent decades, but for over two thousand years scholars of political philosophy have recognized each other as being engaged in the same endeavor and have reacted to each other's arguments, much as Kaufman-Osborn's own research has reacted to Dewey, Marx, and other political philosophers that predate him.

The basic ontological, epistemological, and normative questions of political philosophy constitute the foundation of scholarly research. The answers to them will always remain contested, but it would be a mediocre scholar who never grappled with them. Political philosophy should be the starting point of every political scholar's education, engaging researchers across the entire spectrum of political studies. Some thirty-five to forty years ago, it did that, but today it is largely irrelevant to those who are not specialists in the study of political philosophy itself. The evidence of political philosophy's fall from prominence is unmistakable.

When I attended graduate school in the mid-late 1970s, political philosophy was a requirement in the curriculum. This is not true in most major graduate programs today. Harvard is an exception. In Harvard's Department of Government, political philosophy is a mandatory part of every PhD student's general examinations. When this requirement became a topic of debate, Harvard's graduate students voted to keep it.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Marginalization of Political Philosophy and Its Effects on the Rest of the Discipline
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?