Evaluation of Periodicals Journals and Community of Medical Sciences in Iran

By Najari, A.; Ghazisaid, S. J. M. et al. | Iranian Journal of Public Health, July 1, 2010 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Evaluation of Periodicals Journals and Community of Medical Sciences in Iran

Najari, A., Ghazisaid, S. J. M., Ghorbani, N. R., Heidari, R. N., Iranian Journal of Public Health


Background: Medical journals are scientific resources where utilization of knowledge is availed and create an environment of competitiveness. To speed up the growth and increase scientific production and in order that the rank of Iranian journals be defined regionally and globally, journal standardization is necessary. This study was done to evaluate the country's medical journals from 2004-2006.

Methods: This is a descriptive/analytical study. Evaluation was based on the following; scientific credibility, registry and year of service, journal management, technical quality and accessibility. The number of journals evaluated during 2004- 2006 were 86, 103 and 93, respectively and the process involved 3 phases 1) defining the journal's structural indicators and designing the evaluation form 2) collection, sharing and final confirmation of information with the publication staff 3) data entry, analysis and ranking

Results: Improvement and growth of publication depends largely on 5 parameters and its development were based on the following; publication management (61.62 points), scientific credibility (43.80 points), quality of accessing the journals (37.05 points), quality of publication (14.80 points) and registry and year of service (0.02 points). Based on the study, an upward developmental trend of the country's medical journals can be seen and the tools were sufficient in terms of validity and reliability. A revised and more comprehensive checklist that would evaluate all aspects of a publication basing on latest indicators is developed.

Conclusion: Evaluations of the country's medical journals not only promote compliance to international standards but also led to more indexing of journals in accredited international indices.

Keywords: Medical publication, Medical journals, Community of medical sciences Iran


The growing range of sciences and the enormous growth of information produced in minutes and the speed in the development of the internet and network technologies, research needs, financial constraints and the need for specialized scientific groups; these factors have forced us to integrate in the immense world of information. And for the reason that countries' develop, produce and circulate information with speed, scientific publications play an important role in the national development, in policy making and in applied research as well (1). Taking into consideration the important and valuable role of journals in producing and propagating knowledge, perhaps the most important reason for the lack of simultaneous change in the journals process of publication despite changes in information and communication technology, is the absence of a unified information system in publication. In fact, integration of information at the nationwide level is the only possible way of creating a collective agreement especially in strategies concerning changes in the process of publication printing towards electronic publishing.

What has been an issue of concern is the fact that there exist a wide gap between the developed and the developing countries in terms of biomedical publications and the possible reasons behind are; only few health researches are undertaken in the low-income countries due to lesser research priorities or lesser resources or limitation in research capacities and or problems regarding communication specially in reporting research works and the lack of observance on international standards (2).

Of the more than 130 titles approved by the medical commission, unfortunately these researches did not adhere to international standards and indicators, the difference in the choice of publication processes that would definitely result to indifference (some of these indifference is inevitable) and most importantly, the important role that the journals play in the production and dissemination of knowledge, and based on the 4th development program as undertaken aiming at achieving the first place in the Southwest Asian region in terms of economics, science and knowledge production, the need for continuous evaluation basing on local standards has been considered a necessity.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Evaluation of Periodicals Journals and Community of Medical Sciences in Iran


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?