Determinism in the Book of Ecclesiastes

By Sneed, Mark | Journal of Biblical Literature, Fall 2002 | Go to article overview

Determinism in the Book of Ecclesiastes

Sneed, Mark, Journal of Biblical Literature

Determinism in the Book of Ecclesiastes, by Dominic Rudman. JSOTSup 316. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001. Pp. 226. $85.00.

Rudman's thesis is to demonstrate that Qohelet was a determinist in the vein of the Stoic tradition. In fact, Rudman argues that Stoic thinking has influenced Qohelet. Rudman finds the deterministic teaching of the early Stoics, especially Cleanthes, most compatible with Qohelet's thinking. Generally, they held that human thought (including emotions) and activity are completely controlled by the divine, except for freedom to use authority granted by God in certain human relationships. Rudman sees the book of Qohelet as representing a distinctive theodicy strategy in the Hebrew Bible. Apparently there were Jews who were blaming God for their wicked nature in that he determines everything. Qohelet counters by offering a stoic perspective that admits determinism while at the same time allowing for some human freedom regarding sin. Thus, God cannot be blamed for humans abusing this limited freedom.

Rudman focuses on texts such as 1:3-8; 3:1-15; 7:23-29; 8:17a; and 9:9. He adeptly counters the recent attempt to date the book of Qohelet in the Persian period (Choon-Leong Seow, "Linguistic Evidence and the Dating of Qohelet,"JBL 115 [1996]: 643-66) (ch. 7). Rudman briefly examines the sociohistorical setting of the book (ch. 1). He also does a comparative study of the book's ideas within the context of ancient Near Eastern and Greek literature (ch. 1). He conducts word studies of concepts in the book that reflect possible deterministic thinking (ch. 2). He explores the relationship between divine determinism and human freedom in the book (ch. 7), and he investigates the notion of determinism versus free will in Jewish and Hellenistic literature (chs. 8 and 9).

Parts of chs. 2, 6, and 7 contain material that has been published elsewhere. The book constitutes a revised dissertation completed under the direction of Robert Salters at the University of St. Andrews (1997).

Rudman's method is very traditional. It can be characterized as historical-critical with a heavy linguistic component. Rudman is a true linguist with competency in both Semitic languages and the classics. His research involves a great deal of textual criticism and lexical semantics. His polemic with Seow's Persian dating demonstrates Rudman's knack for historical semantics. His linguistic prowess is evident in proposing better ways to understand the sense of certain words in Qohelet. For example, against understanding (foreign text omitted) in 9:11 in the sense of chance, he argues for predetermined occurrence (pp. 37-40).

Rudman's argument, though well presented, is ultimately not convincing. Basically, he reads stoic concepts and preoccupations back into the text of Qohelet. For example, he equates Qohelet's "sum" (foreign text omitted) with the Heraclitean/Stoic logos (pp. 183-94). Also, the Greeks were troubled with the problem of free will versus determinism, and Rudman has Qohelet solve this dilemma essentially in the same way as did Cleanthes (ch. 9).

This leads to the most basic flaw of his argument: assuming that divine determinism versus free will was ever problematic for Qohelet. Without demonstration of this, the whole question of stoic influence becomes moot. Qohelet clearly blames humans for their sin in 7:20, and he sees no clash with divine determinism. Rudman seems to assume that God, in Qohelet, almost never reacts to human behavior or holds it accountable, the exception being the misuse of limited authority granted to certain persons by him. Rather, God determines almost all human behavior, thought, and actions and allots weal and woe seemingly indiscriminately (pp. 44, 123, 150-59, 169). Free will and its corollary, accountability, then become moot.

The pivotal key to Rudman's argument stems from his connecting 8:16-17, which speaks of the inability of humans to fathom the "work which is done under the sun," with 9:1, which speaks of the "works" of the wise and righteous being in God's power (p. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Determinism in the Book of Ecclesiastes


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.