A Comparison of Methodologies for Uncovering the Structure of Racial Stereotype Subgrouping

By Green, Raymond J.; Manzi, Robert, Jr. | Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, January 1, 2002 | Go to article overview

A Comparison of Methodologies for Uncovering the Structure of Racial Stereotype Subgrouping


Green, Raymond J., Manzi, Robert, Jr., Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal


Our goal was to initiate a series of explorations of the techniques used to investigate person perception and stereotypes. More specifically, do different techniques uncover the same, and assumedly correct, underlying cognitive structure of the perceivers or is our current understanding of social cognition merely a reflection of our data collection and analytic techniques? We also hoped to draw some conclusions concerning White participants' perceptions of Blacks. Participants were given two tasks. One task involved sorting fourteen racial type labels and rating the sorted piles on four scales (e.g., respectable-not respectable). The second task involved generating attributes that described a randomly selected racial type. Both tasks provided data that could be used as input for multidimensional-scaling and hierarchical -clustering analyses. Further, the data from the adjective-generation task was used as input for a discriminant-function analysis. It was predicted that the different data collection and analysis tasks would produce results that emphasized the importance of evaluation in racialtype perception but that the sorting task would reveal more prejudice against Black targets. The results supported the hypotheses.

The extant literature on person perception and stereotyping is immense and impressive (Hilton & Von Hippel, 1996) and there is a wide consensus on a number of important issues. For example, many would agree that stereotypes are pragmatic in that they help guide perceivers through their daily social interactions (Fiske, 1993). An implicit acceptance of this belief has led social cognition researchers to move from an emphasis on the global social-stereotype categories toward investigations of the seemingly more pragmatic subcategories. For example, research indicates that perceivers utilize subcategories when thinking about gender (e.g., Green & Ashmore, 1998), the elderly (Brewer, Dull, & Lui, 1981), Latinos (Huddy & Virtanen, 1995), and Blacks (Devine & Baker, 1991). A wide range of techniques and statistical analyses has been used to investigate these subcategories and little discussion has arisen concerning what, if any, techniques and analyses are most useful. That is, can different methods of investigating person perception lead to different results and interpretations? One noteworthy exception involves the investigation by Devine and Baker of racial subgroups, which included an inquiry into the utility of discriminant function analysis for understanding stereotype organization. We decided to follow their precedent and used the study of racial-subgroup organization as a testing ground for two different methodologies. More specifically, the structure of racial subgroups was investigated using discriminant-function analysis, more conventional multidimensional-scaling and hierarchical-clustering analyses. The results of these techniques were compared and contrasted.

A REVIEW OF DEVINE AND BAKER (1991)

Devine and Baker (1991) examined White' perceivers' perceptions of Blacks to empirically document whether Whites understand and use well-differentiated subgroups of Blacks. They gave participants one of nine labels (Black, Black athlete, businessman Black, ghetto Black, militant Black, Oreo cookie, streetwise Black, Uncle Tom, and welfare Black) and asked them to generate a list of characteristics that best captured the cultural conception of the group. Using discriminant-function analyses, they found two distinct subgroups under the general heading "Blacks" (i.e., "athlete" and "businessman"), but no other distinctions were found among the remaining subgroups. A caveat offered by the authors is that their subject sample (White Midwestern college students) had no real concept of some of the subgroups (e.g., "Oreo cookie," "militant Black").

The research of Devine and Baker (1991) was valuable for two reasons. First, in terms of social cognition, it provided evidence that perceivers can differentiate between the superordinate category "Black" and some subgroup labels.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Comparison of Methodologies for Uncovering the Structure of Racial Stereotype Subgrouping
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.