The [Geo]Scientific Method; Hypothesis Testing and Geoscience Proposal Writing for Students

By Markley, Michelle J. | Journal of Geoscience Education, September 2010 | Go to article overview

The [Geo]Scientific Method; Hypothesis Testing and Geoscience Proposal Writing for Students


Markley, Michelle J., Journal of Geoscience Education


ABSTRACT

Most undergraduate-level geoscience texts offer a paltry introduction to the nuanced approach to hypothesis testing that geoscientists use when conducting research and writing proposals. Fortunately, there are a handful of excellent papers that are accessible to geoscience undergraduates. Two historical papers by the eminent American geologists G. K. Gilbert and T. C. Chamberlin (Gilbert, 1886; Chamberlin, 1897) were the first to fully articulate and explore the method of multiple working hypotheses. Both papers still make for inspirational reading. A long essay on the scientific method by Johnson (1933) presents both a recipe for rigorous scientific thinking and a traditional but detailed articulation of linear hypothesis testing using geologic examples. More recently, papers by Frodeman (1995) about the fundamentally non-linear nature of interpretation and reasoning in the geosciences and Cleland (2001) about a "smoking gun" approach to validating hypotheses are helpful articulations of the geoscientific method, i.e. a shared understanding of how geoscientists articulate, frame, and tackle research questions.

INTRODUCTION

What first-year undergraduates know about scientific methodology likely comes from a high school science class in which they learned a linear scientific method: identify a problem, make a hypothesis, gather data, and test the hypothesis. Yet geologists commonly follow a nonlinear path towards testing hypotheses, and we tend to work on many hypotheses at a time, rarely fully accepting or rejecting any of them. For undergraduate geology majors (and even graduate students), learning the nuances of testing hypotheses like a practicing geologist is a transition, and few college-level geology textbooks adequately support that transition. For example, the textbook I use to teach Physical Geology, Marshak's Essentials of Earth, articulates a linear version of the scientific method. By way of more detailed explanation, Essentials of Earth carefully distinguishes between a hypothesis and a theory, using as a case study the development of plate tectonic theory from the hypothesis of continental drift. Comparable descriptions of the nature of hypothesis testing, the distinction between a hypothesis and a theory, and the case study of the history of ideas about drift and tectonics occur early in both Monroe, Wicander, and Hazlett's Physical Geology and Chernikoff and Whitney's Geology.

It seems natural for introductory geology textbooks to use plate tectonic theory to illustrate elements of the scientific method. I joke with my Physical Geology class that the story of the plate tectonic revolution is the American geologist's Passover story; we delight in its telling and retelling. The story offers opportunities to elaborate upon any number of subdisciplines in geology, from paleontology to rock magnetism. Wegener makes for a wonderful hero - dead in the field before his time. And the embrace of plate tectonics in America is certainly an excellent case study of the development of a theory: plate tectonics only gained widespread embrace after support developed within many different subdisciplines; it was a hypothesis that has now survived repeated challenges; and it has predictive power. Perhaps introductory geology textbooks focus on this careful explanation of the scientific usage of the word theory because of the ongoing culture wars over evolution (which is, after all, "only a theory"). We hope that our undergraduates become scientifically literate, and literacy involves a clear understanding of what a scientific theory is.

Yet we also hope that our undergraduate geoscience majors become more than literate. We hope that they become skilled researchers and sophisticated thinkers. Specifically, we want them to learn a nuanced and realistic approach to designing hypotheses and developing tests for them. I have found surprisingly little support for this learning in college-level geoscience textbooks. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The [Geo]Scientific Method; Hypothesis Testing and Geoscience Proposal Writing for Students
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.